Tuesday 3 February 2015

February '15

NEWS & COMMENT


WELCOME TO THE FUTURE


BRINGING SELF EDUCATION TO YOUR FINGERTIPS
(BECAUSE, YOU CAN’T RELY ON THE MAIN STREAM)

?

*


<><><>

ARE CHEMTRAILS SCIENTIFICALLY PROVABLE? 


We know there are many ways of spraying and for different reasons, with crop spraying and cloud seeding being the most well known. So what we are talking about is not whether it happens which it obviously does but by how much and why.


Solar Radiation Management is one of the names that covers the engineering of our climate, it is not a fallacy with plenty of patents existing for the purpose of spraying our atmosphere.




&


Because it is happening the first question we need to ask is whether it is purely a military operation with their tankers carrying out all these missions, or are they also being done from commercial flights as well and this leads naturally to the next question, how quickly and by how much will it artificially change our climate and the environment in general.

One assumes that due to the use of social media our government agencies will also use it to keep it a taboo subject in the public’s awareness by paying individuals to accomplish this. Whether paid on not there are people out there who use disrupting methods of different kinds and one of the ways that these people try to get normal everyday people to shy away from the topic, is to use the term conspiracy ‘nut’ or some other such derogatory associated term.

Our governments and other don't like the general public knowing about this because they might fear the worst as to what we happen in the future to our climate and environment and so will do what they can to discredit the so called conspiracy nuts.

But we mustn’t forget what the word conspiracy actually means and why they are actually frightened of the word and so give it a bad name.


&


<><><>

IS DEMOCRACY A SHAME, JUST LIKE MOST OF MODERN DAY SO CALLED SCIENCE?

Most people in normal life would say that the world has plainly advanced through science & democracy, so how could I ask such a question. But firstly as far as science goes, all the advancement that has happened is because of our nearly exclusive understanding and use of electricity.

From the electronics that is used in all of our modern technology to how we light and heat our homes (apart from the odd oil heater and candle), to how we run and travel around the world, plus even getting into orbit. 

But could we a whole species actually have been much further down the road? Is the luxury of advancement being purposely held back and so, just being reserved for a few? In the world of science though, there is little doubt with most that openly look at the discrepancies, rather than with blinkered eyes seeing that what we are taught as fact, is ridiculously wrong.

But when seen from outside of academic circles with its beliefs being enforced on everyone, it is easy to see that this is what is happening. Right throughout the twentieth centaury and right upto this point in history, science has been nothing more than a quasi religious fundamentalist movement, which is just full of doctrine and tenet. It of course uses all we know about electricity unreservedly but keeps the pioneers and true heroes well at of the public and academic’s eye line and instead promotes the fantasists of contorted mathematical guesswork for public consumption.

In stead of any type of proper scientific method being used, the religion of scientism relies on guesswork which comes from the foundations of other guesswork and so, trillions upon trillions is wasted propping up a system that employs loads of individuals to prove that the guesswork is wrong and so has to keep the guesswork going and the gravy train for the few moving along nicely for them.

But now because of the www, this can really easily be seen to be happening and so the game is up. So now we have to ask the question who has been behind this on going deceit and for what purpose? 

This lack of any proper scientific method in favour of guesswork that has plagued the twentieth century has very recently been seen and brought into vivid focus with the two comet debacle just before Christmas. Even though those in the Electric Universe community said that the electrical affect of the comet passing close to Mars will be a very noticeable effect on all the tech on and around the red planet and the space agencies should be aware of what will happen, they chose to go with existing guesswork and so encountered the problems that they did.

With the second and ongoing look at comet P-67 and the Rosetta probe in orbit around it and with the crash landing of the lander section, once again it was a total surprise for the mainstream to find that the comet wasn’t a ‘grubby snowball’ as guessed at, but actually a solid lump of rock.

This though hasn’t deterred the main stream from knowing in their minds what is going on and simply said that now there are two classifications of comets instead, the ‘rocky comet’ and still the ‘grubby snowball’, of which we have never actually seen, because all the comets that have been looked at so far, just happen to be the rocky type. 


THE QUEST FOR TRUTH

Parts 1 & 2

The story of Tommy Flowers (who?) is typical of the establishment keeping pioneers dealing with anything to do electricity & truth being hidden to keep their own power bases intact and stop the public knowing who the real heroes are. Tommy invented the ‘Colossus’ which has led us to the modern day computer, so was quite important to the history of today's world to say the least.


The most famous example of this though is the suppression of Nicola Tesla who gave us so much including AC electricity and radio communication, but ended his life in poverty because he wanted to also give free electricity to the world through the wireless transmission system.

One of his benefactors was JP Moran who had the franchise on copper wire transmission lines and so because he represented giving away profits to the general public, he forced Tesla into obscurity and seeing the rest of his life out struggling to even survive.

After that anyone who went down the electrical route in what ever capacity was kept well out of the general public's eye. Who outside of the Electric Universe Theory community these days know of Kristian Birkeland and Ralph Juergens, or even today’s pioneers like Don Scott or Wal Thornhill?


So instead of knowing about the real heroes of science, the establishment set up lackeys to be figureheads to head up scientific thinking as well as for the general consumption of the public and so, promoted people like Einstein who had to come up with a special relativity because the ordinary one didn’t work.

To his credit though, Einstein did at the end of his life admit that he wasn’t happy with what he came up with because he knew it wasn’t anywhere near being complete. This was because he had to admit to himself that not including electromagnetism in his calculations (which is 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion times more powerful than the ‘bending of light by mass on a flat bit of cloth’ (gravity) was a massive mistake.

Another fine example of the establishment keeping the wrong people to the fore for their own benefit, is the unwarranted glorification of people like those who came up with the equation for the totally fictitious black hole- ‘n/0 = ∞’ or in other words, 'anything divided by nothing equals for ever without end', but gladly this type of gobbledygook is now coming to an end.

BOGUS PAPERS ARE CONTINUALLY PUBLISHED


Not only does this happen in the world of Theoretical Physics (which is actually a contradiction in terms) it happens right across the world of so call science, including medicine.

So should these people be locking up and also have their ill gained assets removed as well. Of course I am not talking about the underlings and simple devotees of scientism, but those at the top.

After all the tax Payer is being fleeced right, left and centre by what seems to be inherent in our world today and I don’t think it is any coincidence that this type of behavior has mushroomed since politicians have been saying that it right and good to be selfish and greedy. It's not as if this attitude is good for anyone apart from the very very few.


&


&


Added to the undoubted fraud carried out by some so called scientists, we also have the banking and industrial/military orientated establishment who have kept on mopping up the money supply through the unnecessary reliance on us having to buy energy that we need to run today’s lifestyle.


A NEW CHRONOLOGY FOR A NEW TRUTHFUL AGE


First we must look at what time is and the massive difference between real physics and the term ‘theoretical physics’. This is because the term ‘theoretical physics is actually a contradiction in terms. Physics cannot be theoretical in any way because physics is all about seeing something or detecting it and so being able to measure it. Obviously we can’t see things like radio waves but we can detect them by simply turning a radio to the frequency of a broadcast.

The two contradictory terms of physics and theoretical were lumped together and accepted because Einstein who wasn’t a physicist but a mathematician broke this simple rule and was then held up as a genius by the establishment who wanted the electrical sciences down played.

With contorted equation being taught as fact, it brings into question how we rate genius or even intelligence which uses just an I.Q test and the ability to retain and then regurgitate doctrine. Obviously from the state of play now, this is painfully wrong and even calls into question the validity of the I.Q test itself. In my opinion we must also include common sense, emotional intelligence and pure creativity in gauging intelligence.


Einstein said that time was a dimension but time is a human construct being invented to order our lives and is based on the turning of our planet and so what we call time is nothing more than the movement of matter through three dimensions and so not a dimension.

One of the proofs sited by the ‘standard model’ to prove Einstein right though is his ‘time dilation’ equation that says that the faster you get to the speed of light, the slower time gets. So anyone travelling very fast like astronauts will when they come back to earth be younger than if they stayed on earth, so one person’s time is relative to their own environment, hence ‘relativity’. 

The proof used by Einstein’s devotees to say that time is a dimension though is the experiment that had one atomic clock stationary on earth and two with the the same start time put onto aircraft and flown around the earth and when they got back, the two that were speeding around the globe ended up slower than the one on the ground.

So we need to know how the EUT explains this difference and whether the so called ‘atomic clocks’ that they used where more than has been loosely described, which means the data has been once again fudged to fit Einstein’s theory. 

This is from a friend called Harry-

"There are a number of bogus concepts involved, for instance the idea of "objects being at rest", which would be the "neutral" clock. No matter in the verse is ever at rest, so the concept of rest, as in "at rest mass" for instance, is as meaningless as is "c" which is the speed of light in a vacuum, in a universe where no vacuum can be found.

For instance, all of us on this planet are subject to the motions of the objects we are framed in, the earth, the solar system, the galaxy, the galaxy cluster and who knows what others layers of motion there are. That means, the total potential energy an object is "carrying", is basically unknown. We can't hit the brakes on the universe to test how flat we would end up.

The clocks they are using are light clocks, where a light beam is bounced in a loop (mirrors) and the unit of time is defined by difference between the emitting and receiving of light pulse (a complete loop). Obviously the duration depends on the energy of the light, so when two of the clock sit in the same frame of acceleration/velocity, they rather neatly tick away without much offset, because the total energy of the systems is more or less identical.

But if one clock has an additional motion component, the energy the whole system represents changes, so it must be expected, that the duration of the loop changes."

So with so much fudging going on in mainstream science, can we even trust the time scales which has been given to us as they are built around the ‘standard model’?

With an expanding earth we need some sort of timescale of events with is very different from the standard guesswork. This can be done by looking at the ages of the ocean beds as well as gleaming some idea from the ancient texts as well as the earth’s temperature. 

If modern measuring techniques are correct then the oldest ocean beds are only 250 million years old as opposed to the land masses which are said to be about 4 Billion years old 


If conventional theory is correct Earth formed 4 billion years ago inside Saturn’s influence when the temperatures were jumping between very hot and very cold. At 400 million years there was a massive drop in temperature until 270 million years. This is when I assume the earth left Saturn’s direct environment and suddenly got very cold which would have caused a mass extinction event.

A sudden rise in heat then takes us to the expansion of the earth at about 250m years ago when the first of the massive electrical exchanges between earth and another planetary body would have taken place if the expansion theory is correct which it very much looks like it is.

Time doesn't exist being only just a human construct to order our lives based on the turning of our planet. What is described as time is only the movement of matter through three dimensions. In physics (real physics, not theoretical physics which is actually a contradiction in terms) something has to be seen and/or measured which of course time can't be and so doesn't exist because how we measure it is of human's own construction.

As with a lot of so called proof 'time dilation' is a misinterpretation of data (being polite) to try and keep the 'standard model' alive. When we consider that the force of electromagnetism is 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion times more powerful than the 'bending of light on a flat bit of cloth' (gravity) and that Einstein didn't include it in his equation, we can see just how far out his equations were and why we ended up with have ended up with contorted mathematical equations giving us mystical genie like objects turning galaxies.


Another fine example of the main stream ignoring a proper scientific method is Polonium Halos. Although Dr. Gentry, has his own idea as to why, we can't ignore the science that he presents to us and it certainly goes along with electric fossils and Thundercrabs. 


As usual with the main stream they don't like anything outside of doctrine and tenet and so all they can do is turn things abound and attack his beliefs. Because they know for sure in their own mind set (there own belief) that the Earth is billions of years old, they focus on this, instead of what the observation and science actually says. One Mr. Bailleul who looked at the evidence (or rather couldn't be bothered) even admits that 'all he needs to see' is Gentry's conclusions and belief that the world was created.

Even though he tries to, he can't rationally argue with Gentry's scientific experimentation, yes you can argue with someones belief and conclusions and substitute your own but not with scientific fact.

We know Granites normally cool and form from a melt over a longer period of time rather than the three seconds that Polonium is around for, before decaying into another element. But even if the various Granites from all over the world formed instantaneously, it dosn't mean that they all formed at the same time, it just means the process of formation of these Granites was the same. Different electrical events that formed these Granites could well have been at different times, so what we are talking about is a quick melt and cooling in certain places caused by electrical blasts at different times.



&


<><><>

THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE WORKSHOP ‘14


WAL THORNHILL

Parts 1 & 2


&

DONALD SCOTT

Parts 1 & 2

<><><>

A BATTLE FOR CONTROL OF THE SKIES


They have been steering weather systems for decades but now with a mobile device they can do it more effectively at a local level. Weatherman Steve Scott looks at the energies that are in the atmosphere.


&


&




<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

IT’S ALL A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE


To get an idea of distance and size we start with the moon being just one pixel big and then we venture out into the solar system. Although it seems like a lot of nothing in between we mustn’t forget that it is completely filled with plasma and interacting magnetic fields. Also we must remember that the text that you’ll find along the journey is based on contorted mathematical guesswork and so should be ignored where necessary.


<><><> 


<><><>

ELECTRICAL SCARING


There are many electrical arc scares on Earth which have been ridiculous described as either impact craters or volcanoes, from the very square Barringer Crater to the very round Richat Structure (also known as the Eye Of Africa). Another one is to found in the Siberian Flux Node which has over the years had its fair share of different electrical phenomena centered there. 


&


<><><>


&


&


<><><>


BUT ARE THINGS CHANGING IN THE MAIN STREAM
Due to major inconsistencies that have been proven to be the case in other events, the Paris event is also up for examination. This is not strange in the free news media which isn't directed as to what to say by governments and the military/industrial complex, but when it is reported in the main stream it seems to indicate that some members of the main stream might actually have a backbone after all and not simply be taking a wage and speaking through their backsides.

But then again was it the mainstream? Even though videos may have an air of authority by putting BBC at the start and have a BBC sounding commentator, it doesn’t automatically mean it is produced by them. In the world of a double, double, double bluff this could be done in order to discredit the video and so the footage later, or even just to get lots of hits and/or get it to a wider public.

Yes there are many layers which need to be seen through but in the end it still keeps ordinary people in a state of fear and so keeping us thinking that only the authorities who are able to protect us. Least we forget the past.


&


&


&

PAST EVENTS


&

&

<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>



&


&


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>



<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>



<><><>


<><><>


EXTRA TERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS





<><><>


<><><>

THE 1976 IRANIAN UFO INCIDENT
Parts 1 & 2

<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

<><><>


<><><>

FAKE UFOS?
IT has always been hard to tell whether something is real, a misidentification or a hoax, well thing have just got harder for night time spotting as ‘Spaxels’ have now entered the arena. They are small drones.


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


Posted by phil the fish at 21:07