Thursday 1 January 2015

HAPPY NEW YEAR 2015


news & comment 


WELCOME TO THE FUTURE


BRINGING SELF EDUCATION TO YOUR FINGERTIPS
(BECAUSE YOU CAN’T RELY ON THE MAIN STREAM)

?

*
2015: AT THE CROSSROADS

MASSIVE DISHONESTY TO KEEP THE STATUS QUO OF UNFAIRNESS


This is happening all over the place, in normal everyday life as well as places like academia. Protests around the world have been massive over the last few years and have been continuous, although you would not be alone if you don’t know much of it. and this is because of the massive non reporting by the Main Stream Media with an active cover up of truth in all walks of life.

While the political and academic authorities do everything to try and squash the right to demonstrate, expose wrong doings and the call for change, it is left to the Free Press to let people know what is going.


&

One of the tactics used is the agent provocateurs manage to infiltrate the demos and cause trouble and violence, then the MSM will be all over it and do their level best to show the world, so it stops other peaceful people from joining in.

In the world of Academia they are spammers, trolls and haters but the idea is the same, to secure a comfortable life for the few while the mass suffer.


&


With the world being full of corrupt people in the MSM, officialdom and even in academia with the debacle of science.


Yes science, main stream is in such a mess now and once everyone knows this and that the 'standard model' is built on just very poorly conceived contorted mathematical gibberish, then the whole house of cards will come tumbling down.

So the mainstream obviously don’t want the truth to come out and have it known that they haven’t a clue how the universe works and that they should be doing a proper job in stead of having a life of riley with all the perks, admiration and glory that comes with it.

Up until the end of 2012 and into 2013 with the release of the ‘Thunderbolts of the Gods’ documentary and then the ‘Tipping Point’ conference just after in the new year, the main stream had managed to keep their positions of power and privilege and this was done through cowering under the umbrella of mathematical gobbledygook which Stephen exposed. So it took them a bit by surprise to see the old world of deceit coming to an end with a new Copernican revolution of true science emerging.

In the Past they could rely on everyone not being able to argue with them due to not knowing how to do complicated sums and mainstream cosmology keeping the real science done by Thornhill and the like well under the radar, so everything in the garden was rosy for them but then the winter started to set in and showed just how exposed they really were.

Because Stephen is an honest and a jolly decent fellow who pointed out the error in their ways, the main stream suddenly shat their pants and so could only retort by immaturely calling him names and talking even more rubbish in the hope that everyone thought he was charlatan, when in fact it was them who were the fraudsters.

So because they did used fraudulent tactics to hold onto their jobs and line their back pockets with funding, a hell of a lot of them should now not only be sacked forthwith but also be put up on charges of defrauding the tax payer with many going to prison with all their assets being recovered.

So lets hope for a fairer 2015 with a round up of those who go out of their way to keep the rest of the population on their knees through fraudulent methods and have a return to honesty which will take the whole of the human race forward and not just the money grabbing wicked few.

MATHEMATICS
This is the type of thing people in the world has to put up with in order for the house of cards stays standing. Stephen Crothers is an honest and totally honorable man and has pointed out the wrong thinking that plagues science and so has incurred the wroth of academia with its devotees of scientism trying to send out a false message to the general public as well as others in academia.


STEPHEN CROTHERS


“Below is my response to Waite, which I posted to the comments section of his Youtube page shortly after he posted it, and which he quickly removed.

To the Speaker, David Waite:

Thankyou for drawing further attention to my research; but beginning your exposition by calling me a quack is not scientific by any stretch of the imagination.

(1) You say that I think frame transformations of a given metric are independent metrics.

This charge is patently false. Please provide your audience with a citation of the paper or papers, by me, with section references, in which you allege that I argue that frame transformations produce metrics that not equivalent.

The different solutions I refer to in my papers and videos are different only in appearance and I correctly go by the names of those who first adduced them, but they are all equivalent, except for Hilbert’s, which isn’t equivalent.

(2) You assert that I said the different solutions referred to in (1) above are corruptions of one another. You also assert that at some places I say the ‘Schwarzschild coordinates’ are a corruption due to Hilbert and at other places I say they are a corruption by Droste. These charges are also patently false. Please provide your audience with a citation of the paper or papers, by me, with section references, by which you allege I claim that the ‘Schwarzschild coordinates’ are a corruption due to Droste, and that the different solutions I refer to are corruptions of one another. I clearly stated in several of my papers that Hilbert’s solution is a corruption of Droste’s and of Schwarzschild’s because Hilbert’s solution contains 0 </= r, which has no equivalent in Schwarzschild’s or Droste’s, the latter two being equivalent. Hilbert’s solution is not equivalent to Schwarzschild’s, Droste’s, or Brillouin’s either, despite it having the same line-element as Droste.

(3) You assert that the Schwarzschild solution, although a vacuum solution, can also be the solution outside a spherically symmetric material source, and mock me for arguing that no matter can be present in a set of equations that by mathematical construction contains no terms for a material source. However, any set of equations that contains no terms for material sources by mathematical construction can’t contain material sources. After all, Einstein’s alleged gravitational field must have a material source, and his field equations couple his gravitational field, manifest in the curvature of his spacetime, with its material sources. The material sources of Einstein’s gravitational field are described by his energy-momentum tensor for matter, T_{uv}. When this is set to zero there is no material source present to cause any gravitational field, inside or outside anything. In the case of R_{uv} = 0, the solution for which is the Schwarzschild solution, T_{uv} = 0. In the case of R_{uv} = Lg_{uv} where L is the so-called cosmological constant, the solution is de Sitter’s empty universe, which is empty because it contains no material sources whatever. However, in the case of de Sitter’s empty universe T_{uv} = 0 as well. Thus, according to Einstein and his followers, material sources are both present and absent by the very same mathematical constraint, T_{uv} = 0. That’s impossible. R_{uv} = 0, and hence Schwarzschild’s solution thereto, contains no matter whatsoever for the very same reason de Sitter’s empty universe contains no matter whatsoever, namely, T_{uv} = 0.

(4) You mention Birkhoff’s Theorem and mock me again, jibing I must have slept though a lesson on that, etc. and that I don’t understand that according to this Theorem the solution is just the Schwarzschild solution. This false charge is a corollary to your false charge (1) above, so this charge too is patently false. Please cite for your audience the paper or papers, by me, with section references, by which you claim that I don’t understand ‘Birkhoff’s Theorem’.

More For The General Audience:

I remark for the general audience that it is not necessary to consider Schwarzschild’s solution or Hilbert’s corruption thereof, or any expression for the solution to R_{uv} = 0, or indeed any mathematical expressions whatever, to prove that the black hole and the big bang are fallacious. Here is a short and simple non-mathematical overview to this effect:

THE RISE AND FALL OF BLACK HOLES AND BIG BANGS
http://www.principia-scientific.org/the-rise-and-fall-of-black-holes-and-big-bangs.html

Here is a more detailed non-mathematical exposition:

Black Hole and Big Bang: A Simplified Refutation,
http://viXra.org/abs/1306.0024

Here is a reasonably short mathematical exposition:

On the alleged ‘Incompleteness’ of General Relativity,
http://viXra.org/abs/1406.0038?

&


<><><>


<><><>

EU2015 CONFERENCE



SHERATON DOWNTOWN
PHOENIX, ARIZONA, USA
25-29 JUNE 2015

&


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

COMET LOVEJOY


After reading various people's comments from some FB group pages, there does seem to be some confusion as to where to look for Comet Lovejoy during January and especially which side of the constellation Orion it will be passing. So this where to look for it if you are lucky enough not to be bathed in light pollution and have clear skies. It will be best to use a pair of binoculars or small telescope but it can be seen with the naked eye as a small green smudge. What we would like though is a CME from the Sun to really light it up.

<><><>

RUPERT SHELDRAKE


An electric Universe is completely interconnected with electromagnetic fields running through plasma being everywhere. So our thinking which uses an electrochemical process touches the rest of the universe.

<><><>

THE CLIMATE


With the obvious contradiction in the evidence of what we see today, yes it is hard to see what is going on from a standard view point and this is certainly shown to be the case by NASA.

From my EUT stand point I think that we must look at the electrical trend to see where we might be heading and not today's reading of heat. From the temperature maps we see that the 'Little Ice Age' was warmer globally than today so I think that it was a direct reduction from the Sun's electrical output that brought on the ice which then made it cold and not just a drop in temperature first.


<><><>

TIME IS NOT A DIMENSION



What we call time is just humans needing to construct a way to order our lives to the turning of our planet. What it really is, is matter in motion moving through three dimensions and nothing more.


<><><>

IS THEORETICAL & PHYSICS A CONTRADICTION IN TERMS?


In the world of physics and by its very nature, something has to be measurable and quantifiable and this is where the theorists of Quantum Mechanics come into conflict with the term physics. There are thirteen different types of QM because none of them work to any satisfaction and so can’t be regarded as physics.

So really the two words shouldn’t be lumped together but they are so the funding and honors that are handed out gives some sort of semblance of respectability as far as the general public and the theorists egos goes.


&


&


<><><>

AN EXPANDING WORLD OR PLATE TECTONICS?


We in the EUT community have touched on this more than once before but as so many new people now coming on board and exploring the EUT, I thought it was time we touched on it again as it is one of the less well known areas of research in the cosmology. In the past we could only look at the visual evidence, pondered and then just talked over the mechanism that might be behind it.

But why do we even doubt the existing model of Plate Tectonics and think that the world was a much smaller globe in the past. To start with we use the first part of the scientific method, Observation. 



Also we have the problem with the cracks that run around our Earth, they are in the wrong place as far as traditional guess work goes, for example if we look to see where the ‘ring of fire’ is, it runs around the Pacific where as the obvious mid ocean ridge runs around the Atlantic, so if the conventional guesswork was correct then we should have volcanoes in Cornwall, all along the east coast of the Americas, Portugal and Africa. 


Secondly we use Measurement. It is impossible for any Ocean bed to push its way through the Earth’s upper liquid mantel as it has been told to us because it has twice the density of granite.


Plus because some dinosaurs were so massive in the past, their weight couldn’t possibly in any way have been supported by their muscles and bones in today’s gravity. But one of the main problems with this and is often cited by the traditionalists, is the question of gravity. An expanding earth due to mass would mean that even though it is bigger, the mass would be the same and so gravity would be the same and so we can't use that as an example of expansion.

To make the math work with an expanding earth and a stronger gravitational field, it would need to get that extra mass from somewhere to make the gravitational field become stronger and of course how do you get all that extra mass into the earth?
Now though Peter Woodhead has worked out the Math.

This is a fine example of how science should be approached and that is, looking at the evidence first and then working out through measurement and reason to show it in an equation. Although this is ongoing as far as the rest of the scientific method goes through Experimentation and Prediction, this is the proper way of going about things rather than just fantasizing a idea first and then looking to prove that guesswork by shoehorning any observational evidence into the guesswork.

Because the ‘standard model’ doctrine says the earth has a magnetic field and because we live in an electrically inert universe with empty voids between stars and planets, then the earth must have a iron ore core spinning around to make that field. Of course there is no actual proof that the earth has a core because we have never drilled down far enough to prove it but as usual, it is still being taught as fact and so automatically dismisses the observation of the continents fitting together on a smaller planet and that a lot of dinosaurs plus two foot long insects were simply too big to live on the earth.

After he explains the evidence and the math, at 43 minutes into the video Mr. Woodhead ties it in with our Electric Universe Theory.


&


With the discovery that water is still locked into the rock beneath our feet, an expanding earth would also explain where the oceans originally come from.



<><><>


&


&


<><><>



<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

RECOVERING THE LOST WORLD

The Earth Grid System has been speculated about by many over the decades and I myself have touched on it more than once in the blog. My understanding and best guesstimate now is that yes there was a previous human kind who were technologically advanced but not like today. They were more basic but they learned to use and manipulate massive mounts of very dangerous raw energy.

The planet earth has 1000s of pyramids on its surface and the shape of a pyramid makes it an excellent energy collector. We have also found plenty of sunken cities and other monuments with a very high degree of workmanship and from all around the world. So there is more than enough to say that man have gone a long way before, but then catastrophe happened.

It might be the system drawing too many amps from the ionosphere or it could be just a variable sun. For the system to be functional I think that there must have been a lot more electrical activity in the skies anyway and we know electricity is notoriously not smooth. So either their luck runs out and a series of massive thunderbolts reeked havoc, or they got greedy and the universe said enough is enough.

I see a massive series of bolts hit the system at different locations around the world, with arc discharges centering on what is now the Azores. I think the features on the ocean bed in and around the islands plus its location being mid Atlantic and sitting on the junction of the mid Atlantic crack and the crack that divides Europe from Africa and it being west of the Straights of Gibraltar; make it the ideal candidate for the legendary land.

The load that centered on Atlantis but probably hit elsewhere as well would have fused the whole earth grid system with it blowing off the coating stones at Giza. This one event then plunged man back into infancy, as described by Plato.


&




&


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

RESOLVING WAVE-PARTICLE DUALITY PARADOX
I have said before that because there are thirteen different versions of Quantum Mechanics it can’t in any way be described as a working model. In the EUT is not considered as in not needed and is in fact a diversion from actually is going on.


<><><>

EXTRA TERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS


<><><>


<><><>