Tuesday 3 March 2015

March '15

news & comment


WELCOME TO THE FUTURE


BRINGING SELF EDUCATION TO YOUR FINGERTIPS
(BECAUSE, YOU CAN’T RELY ON THE MAIN STREAM)

?

*

GEOLOGY OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM

HAVE THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WALKED ON MARS AND NOT KNOWN IT?


Looking closely at Ayers Rock in Australia, as well as straight lines running across it, some of these are in fact crater chains which normal wind erosion has a problem explaining. So my current thinking is that because it looks like Phobos, it too could well be a bit of Mars and of course the colour certainly goes with the Red Planet.


Plus if you look at the surrounding topography of Ayers Rock there is a definite crater around it which seems to have filled in somewhat over the millennium. But if this is the case then it must have landed without totally disintegrating and creating a massive impact event, so I can only think that it didn't fall that far and so gain too much speed which would mean that the Earth and Mars was really close which does along with planetary migration. This could as well be the reason that in the past it was said that you couldn't stand up because the sky was very close.
&

SUSPICIOUS OBSERVERS CHATS TO MICHAEL STEINBACHER

Part 12

<><><>




&


<><><>



The earth/ionosphere system is a capacitor with the atmosphere being the dielectric. So the charge from the sun hits the ionosphere at the poles and then seeps down to earth by way of charging the whole atmosphere, unless there is an excess of charge (CME etc) where it charges thunderclouds and then release the stored charge in arcs, tornadoes, waterspouts and the rain as well as in the general seepage.

Ions negative and positive can be created interdependently of this general everyday process and just means they have extra electrons added or taken away from a balanced charged atoms. So the electrical charge which arrives on hydrogen particles coming from the Sun isn't the same as the electrical charge of an individual ion on earth but may affect it.

This is why some people feel ill when there are storms around because the charge from the storm is giving extra charge to the atmospheric ions which our bodies don't like. Where as when we are near running water the water is pulling charge from the atmospheric ions and making them negative and so when we breath them in they then attract any positively charged pollutants in our system which we then get rid of by breathing out.


&


<><><>

COMET 67P IS ARCING NICELY NOW


As the surface temperature rises to about -40 degrees C the 'Grubby Snowball' is really melting now.

All joking apart, this image actually proves the electrical nature of the comet and that it is the arcing that is causing the light to be seen.

There has been a bit of discussion on different forums saying that it is the discharges from the comet that is being lit by the sun, with the shadow of the back lobe causing the cut off point of the illumination, but this isn't the case when the image is studied without preconceived notions.

The edge of the back lobe is completely different from the illuminated line with it being deep in shadow against the cliff edge and when we look at any pre-arcing picture we can see that the line of illumination is following the bottom of cliff edge and because it is in complete shadow this can only mean that the discharge is self illuminating and so be an electrical arc.






&

THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT



The trouble with the Double Slit Experiment is the Quantum Mechanics definition and understanding that says that electrons are little balls of solid matter. But even with this definition these little balls of matter are not actually solid balls like marbles but have to be hollow because they surround the much more highly charged Proton and the electrically neutral Neutron which makes up the nucleus of the atom. So the closet the main stream has come to describing them is that they are thin shell like objects just like an egg shell.


But this definition still runs into a problem because in order to separate them from the nucleus they would have to break open the shells and leave them in bits in order to remove the nucleus. So what we are looking at is the electron being in a gaseous state rather than a solid and so be more fluid and so, create waves when travelling through the two slits.

Because of this basic lack of understanding of what constitutes a electron meant that they thought they could then see what was happening by putting a detector by one slit or the other and of course because the electrons was negatively charged they were attracted to the positive charge in the atom’s nucleus of the detector and so went through that slit only.  

The double slit experiment hinges on electrons being particles rather than just being a balancing energy of charge. It is said to exist as a particle even though it has a mass of only 1/1,840 the mass of a proton and so is actually considered to have 'nearly no mass'. So if mass is derived from charge rather than actual matter, it isn't a particle at all and so does not validate the Double slit experiment at all and so it is the interaction of the atom's nucleus with the æther that gives it a negative value and so the small amount of mass that is supposedly measured.

<><><>

CERN BACK ON LINE



Parts 12

By smashing together small bits of matter together into smaller bits they hope to find rather than just smashed up bits of matter, the theoretical Higgs Boson particle in there somewhere which by theory is fundamental in proving that gravity is the only force needed in forming and holding the universe together.

Upto now though they have only found the original bits of matter that have been smashed up (which they have given other names to) and so have had to lie through their arses by saying that they have found indications, hints, what looks like it may be etc etc to say that it exists. 

They also are hoping to find Dark Matter although I am not sure how they have postulated that they can do this, seeing that upto now everywhere they looked so far (and spent tons more money) they have found once again, Jack ****.

Because they refuse to accept that there is electricity turning galaxies (intergalactic Birkeland Currents), even though that they have measured magnetic fields and only electricity produces magnetic fields, they continually spend billions on accepted scientism’s doctrine & tenet, or in other words total ****.


<><><>





Gravitational Lensing is supposed to be optical illusion that is created by light from a more distant galaxy being bent around one (or even two) much nearer. If these objects were just optical illusions though, then we would see them all over the sky but we don't.

Also if gravitational lensing was a reality then we would be definitely seeing this effect at the middle of our own Milky Way galaxy as the stars there circle in front of the central core but we don’t.

So what we are looking at isn’t an illusion, unlike like the contorted mathematical guesswork that makes up the traditional guesswork and comes up with this sort of idea, but looking down the barrel of a plasma pinch planetary bi-polar nebula that is formed around a Birkeland Current, or in the case of the smiley face multiple currents running together.




<><><>


<><><>

GRAVITY, MASS & CHARGE



Gravity is currently calculated from the mass of an object, which is the amount of and what type of atom/s an object has. So a change in gravity would make it look like there is a change in the amount of atoms an object has but this is wrong, it's the change in the electrical field in which an object sits that gives it more or less gravity as well as its mass.

Like a lot of today's contorted mathematical guesswork, this is came about because of Einstein refusing to include the electromagnetic force into his understanding and went only with a gravity model. This was even though the force of Electromagnetism is 10^39 or 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion times more powerful than gravity.

When a comet is a long way from the sun it is a less charged environment and so appears to be lighter, hence they think comets are 'grubby snowballs'. But as it gets nearer to the sun it enters a more highly charge field and so will appear to suddenly have more gravity. This causes the traditionalists much confusion but does in the end open the way to get more funding so they take more guesses as to what what is going on.

So in future (and hopefully not too distant) gravity will be calculated by the amount of charge there is in the field around an object as well as the amount of mass it has.

So we can now consider how this will affect the Rosetta probe that is in orbit around Comet 67P and especially as it gets closer to the Sun and especially when it gets struck by Solar Flairs, like the recent one that has just hit it. So what I expect is for the gravity to increase and so pull the space probe towards the comet and at an increasing rate as the field around the comet is subjected to an increase in charge.


COMETS

<><><>

WHERE IS THE LINE BEING DRAWN IN THE U.S WITH POWER


As the surveillance on the ordinary citizen becomes all embracing in the States, there is little that the authorities will not do to totally control their lives.


<><><>


<><><>

THE ASTROTAS LECTURE: “THE GREATEST PARADIGM SHIFT IN HISTORY”



The Astrotas Lecture: “The greatest paradigm shift in history.” This two hour talk gives a fantastic overview of the whole cosmology, from the workings of the Sun and how planets are really formed to the where we are now, even within ourselves.


<><><>

ANOTHER SCIENTIST SHOWN UP FOR BEING A FRAUD
The sooner the Electric Universe is accepted the better so science can once again be what it supposed to be, an understanding of how our universe works rather than just paying people to spout rubbish.


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>

EXTRA TERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS




<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>


<><><>