TERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS
Due to my other commitments in life now but largely due the Facebook group I started and administer on a daily basis and which has really taken off, I will now for the moment at least, will be producing this blog every two months. To apply to join the Facebook Group and get all the Electric Universe info on a daily basis, just click the link towards the bottom the ride side-bar.
Due to my other commitments in life now but largely due the Facebook group I started and administer on a daily basis and which has really taken off, I will now for the moment at least, will be producing this blog every two months. To apply to join the Facebook Group and get all the Electric Universe info on a daily basis, just click the link towards the bottom the ride side-bar.
WELCOME TO THE FUTURE
BRINGING SELF EDUCATION TO YOUR FINGERTIPS
Time doesn't exist, there is only motion of matter through three dimensions. 0 degrees kelvin is the only constant in the universe and this is the only place where time can be adjusted because that adjustment is only when time gets turned off with all matter stopping moving through the three dimensions.
So in those respects time is either 1=on or 0=off and so yes on its most fundamental level we do live in a matrix of 1s & 0s. Next questions, where does that the matrix of reality come from and what actually is it.
All measuring devices are based on just the rough turning of the earth over a twenty four hour period and once the clock was invented, it enslaved our experience of reality to increments of movements through three dimensions. Time can count itself off, but how we individually experience it is down to how much or how little movement through the three dimensions we experience.
As charge changes all matter and all measuring devises are made of matter, no matter what the measuring device, charge will be for ever changing and so making any measuring device's data used at the quantum level or to accurately measure time, automatically invalid.
Any experiment which is done to speculate about temperatures below 0 kelvin is just funding making speculation. This is one of the best bits of gobbledygook that I have seen lately-
"....The researchers observed that the atoms could all be in their lowest energy band level and very near to the lower edge of that energy band level. Consequently, the system was extremely ordered (the amount of order is key to this) and, as you might expect, very cold. Keeping the atoms in this low-energy state led to a temperature of only a few billionths of a Kelvin.1 This situation resembles placing a bunch of balls into a small valley, where it's extremely unlikely for them to roll out.3
By very suddenly turning the valley of the optical lattice into a hill, the researchers essentially “flipped” the entire system around, causing the atoms to go into the upper edge of their lowest energy band. This is akin to turning a stable valley into a stable hill. This new “hill” is very stable, and the atoms would not roll off the hill to another energy state. In this situation the atoms are very ordered, cannot go to another energy level, and have a negative temperature value!...."
Atoms rolling off of Light waves, are they serious. Yep it's potentially worth loads of funding.
<><><>
*
FROM EU2015
*
*
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
GOING BACK TO THE MOON
"Watch our cool movie about going back to the Moon. In case you haven’t heard, the Moon is trending again… and in a big way. Narrated by Tim Allen (voice of Buzz Lightyear), this is a complete behind-the-scenes feature on the $30 million Google Lunar XPRIZE, the largest incentivized prize in history. Adapted from the award-winning digital planetarium show, the 24-minute movie chronicles 18 teams from around the world looking to make history by landing a privately funded robotic spacecraft on the Moon. This global competition is designed to spark imagination and inspire a renewed commitment to space exploration, not by governments or countries."
<><><>
END OF PHYSICS? HARDLY, WE ARE RETURNING TO REAL PHYSICS
Jokers, except the joke is on us and those who agree to fund such white elephants built on contorted mathematical guesswork. Although those that work there like to call themselves physicists, CERN has nothing to do with the Real Science of Physics, its just poorly conceived fantasy at a massive cost.
"According to Einstein's theory of general relativity and the theory of quantum mechanics — the two theories in physics that drive our understanding of the cosmos on incredibly large and extremely small scales — the Higgs field should be performing one of two tasks, says Cliff.
Either it should be turned off, meaning it would have a strength value of zero and wouldn't be working to give particles mass, or it should be turned on, and, as the theory goes, this "on value" is "absolutely enormous," Cliff says. But neither of those two scenarios are what physicists observe."
Thankfully those in the our community use a proper scientific method which shows an Electric Universe is inclusive over many orders of magnitude, and so works from the very small to the very big and so is bringing science back into science and not wasting billions on gobbledegook.
<><><>
PUTTING REAL SCIENCE INTO SCIENCE FICTION
There are many who are thinking in terms of marrying the real EUT science with Sci-Fi stories and so make them scientifically accurate, but there is little at the moment that is actually written about it and so no references points to why what has gone before is wrong and where one would get some pointers to get it right. The original downloadable PDF can be obtained at Electric Cosmology FB Group Page in the 'Files' tab, see right hand 'side bar' of this blog.
"Putting Science Back Into Science Fiction
by Dana E. Lubich
Wikipedia defines science fiction as “writing rationally about alternative possible worlds or futures. It is similar to, but differs from fantasy [in] that… its imaginary elements are largely possible within scientifically established or scientifically postulated laws of nature…” (Italics mine.)
In an effort to increase the validity of story concepts, writers of novels and TV/films have looked to the mainstream scientific community to provide such “accuracy,” often on a consulting basis.
Unfortunately, being based on the gravity-driven miracles that science, today, relies on, such stories are plunged deeply into pure, unadulterated, fantasy.
It may seem frivolous to discuss science fiction on a web site devoted to Electric Universe (EU) science, but consider the power “sci-fi” has exerted on the public. How many scientists, astronauts, etc., have stated that they were inspired to pursue their fields based on an early exposure to this genre? If incorrectly-based science fiction can have that kind of power, think of the power correctly-based science fiction can have.
Before encouraging a new era of science fiction, showcasing the views of the EU, it would be good to reflect on how past works hold up to the new paradigm, as lessons learned.
The following is only a sampling, and not exhaustive. Volumes could be written about the whole genre, even about the specific titles listed:
*
*
2001: A Space Odyssey © Warner Bros. Entertainment
2001: A Space Odyssey: The granddaddy of them all (and personal favorite) has an enigmatic black monolith buried in the crater Tycho, four-million years ago. However, EU theorists postulate that planetary bodies received their catastrophic topography–including Tycho’s creation–as recently as man has painted petroglyphs on cave walls… thousands, not millions of years ago.
Also, if one interprets “The Ultimate Trip” sequence as a trip through a Star Gate “wormhole” (novel: “Space turned and twisted upon itself.”), the EU has put to rest the “rubbery” quality of Einstein’s “space-time,” making that “trip” impossible. However, if one interprets the sequence as faster-than-light travel in “real” space, this is allowed in the EU, once Einstein’s “speed limit” signs are removed.
*
Deep Impact: A standard model, “dirty snowball,” comet threatens Earth, requiring a heroic mission to save the day. As comets and asteroids are, mostly, one and the same (differentiated only by their orbits and electrical activity) the producers could have just used the rocky asteroid set–as strange as it looked–from the movie Armageddon.
Also, the comet was shown venting “gases” on the day side, when, in fact, cathode jets should have been active–even on the night side–as can occur. The hapless astronauts “blown” out by this venting would have really been electrically “fried.” End of mission. (At the end of the day, though, the comet most likely would have just blown up as it hit Earth’s plasmasphere. No mission required.)
*
*
Doctor Who episode “The End of the World”: In five-billion years the good Doctor arrives to see the standard solar model reach its predicted end, as the core runs out of hydrogen. The resultant red-giant engulfs poor Earth, before the sun’s eventual demise. Of course, as the sun is really powered from an external electric circuit, it will continue to shine, as long as it stays “plugged in” to the galactic circuit. (And yes, since space can’t turn “inside out,” the inside of the TARDIS is still as small on the inside as it is on the outside. No “trans-dimensional” widening here.)
*
*
Space: 1999: Both advocates of gravity- and electric-driven models would consider a moon propelled out of Earth’s orbit, by a nuclear blast, absurd. However, once belief is suspended on that point, a moon passing through a different solar system each week would be subjected to too much charge differential, becoming a super comet each episode.
Its topography would change from episode to episode, never looking the same twice. One carefully placed cathode jet would create an “Alpha Crater,” where the moon base once stood. End of series. (Of course, as planetary bodies assume orbits that effect the least electrical interaction, the moon most likely would have “settled down” into orbit in the first solar system it entered, if not our own, post-breakaway.)
*
Star Trek, et al: The ”Final Frontier” was certainly “Einstein’s Frontier.” To trek through the stars within an hour show, Kirk and Company had to circumvent Einstein’s speed of light limit. So they turned to Einstein again and used engines to “warp” the “fabric of space” for expedient travel (through not just one, but multiple universes), and something similar for their “subspace” communications. Fortunately, the EU is Star Trek “friendly,” removing such speed limit barriers (but does limit us to the one universe only).
Also, the electric force can both repel and attract, so anti- and artificial gravity are possibilities for the Enterprise, too.
However, antimatter for propulsion, and transporters for expedient “shore parties,” is out. To quote Wal Thornhill: “[M]atter can neither be destroyed nor created, despite the widespread misconception that the “m” in E = mc^2 means matter, and that antimatter annihilates matter. [The only possibility that I can imagine for a Teleporter would be to create an identical physical copy from materials already to hand at the receiver. But there is far more to biology than meets the scientific reductionist eye. Would the copy be alive? And if so, who, if anyone, would it be? And what do you do with the original - kill it and dispose of the body in the process?]” Perhaps Dr. McCoy was right in trying to avoiding the infernal machine! (It’s interesting to note that Australian scientists have worked on “beaming” rubidium atoms through fiber optics at the speed of light. The practical implication for the future is quantum networks for incredibly fast computers. Perhaps “duotronics” is just around the corner.)
Ironically, a Galactic Rim Barrier that was featured in two episodes, and considered purely fictitious, could be explained by the EU as a section of our galaxy’s powerful double-layer, separating its plasma from extra-galactic plasma.
*
The Black Hole © Disney
*
The Black Hole: This Disney film was mostly a critical flop at the box office… which is more than one can say for its alleged, real life counterpart. So-called “real life” black holes are a true, and total, scientific “flop.” Once your nonexistent title object is removed, all you’re left with are two dilapidated space ships, and a clichéd villain (although, John Barry’s music score still shines). Mathematical singularities a movie does not make.
*
*
The Planet of the Apes, et al: A time dilation tour-de-force, astronauts travel for 18 months (ship time) while 2000 years elapse on Earth, making the fourth millennium an extended “year of the monkey” (well, okay, apes). With Einstein out of the way, and the speed of light not a barrier, time is universal in the EU. Ship and Earth time remain constant.
*
*
The Time Machine: Though not the first to invent time travel, H.G. Wells’ story was the first to popularize this sub-genre, playing to the historian’s (himself, one) desire to study the past–or ”future histories”–in person. Alas, with space and time not being able to “curve back” on
themselves, as Einstein would have us believing, life is a one-shot, forward moving event in the EU… and tomorrow will arrive when it comes, not at our beckoning.
*
*
When Worlds Collide: The movie that relates closely to the catastrophism the interdisciplinary EU supports. Extrasolar star Bellus destroys the Earth, with companion planet Zyra taking over Earth’s orbit (it’s never stated what happens to Bellus). The Thunderbolts team posits that Saturn was once a small star that yielded to the Sun’s influence, possibly arriving from outside the solar system. A violent rearrangement of planetary bodies occurred. Had a Bellus/Zyra system entered our own, Bellus might have gone the way of Saturn, with its electrical power usurped by the Sun (the movie depicted Bellus as rather dim, easily viewed with the naked eye). Rather than destroy the Earth, both would no doubt have assumed orbits that would have effected the least electrical interaction with the rest of the planets. With so much charge differential potentially occurring, it could have been re-titled
“Thunderbolts of the Gods II: The Sequel!”
The foregoing critiques may seem to characterize the EU as limiting the “fun” this genre has been used to. Though limited to one universe, and time frame only (the present), skilled writers should still have ample material to work with, from the micro- to the macro-universe.
It’s been said, of course, that the best science fiction–as with any fiction–is that which deals with the characters and their relationships, not with gadgets and science. However, in getting the science right, one needn’t be distracted by glaring faux pas, so one can focus on the characters.
For those writers who’d like to put solid science back into their science fiction, the many pages found at thunderbolts.info, and others, such as holoscience.com, can be your guide and inspiration toward better literary and visual works. A few excellent, running tutorials are:
The Beginner's Guide to the Electric Universe
*
Essential Guide to the EU
*
A New Paradigm of Scientific Thought – The Electric Universe
To conclude on a light note, I’d like to suggest a sequel series to the popular sitcom, The Big Bang Theory. That series portrays three young, nerdy scientists (and one engineer), fully immersed in the mainstream scientific scene. In the last episode, the scientific world would be rocked by the accumulated evidence supporting the EU, putting out of work all incorrigible scientists (including these four nerds) who support gravity-driven cosmology.
After the cast’s eviction, four new characters move in: Wal Thornhill, Dave Talbott, Mel Acheson and Don Scott, for a show entitled The Electric Universe Theory (which would derive most of its humor at the expense of gravity-driven believers).
And, yes, neighbor Penny would find sensible, EU scientists far more attractive―and easier to understand―than their gravity-obsessed counterparts…
In memory of James Hogan, the science fiction writer who embraced the Electric Universe.
Copyright © Dana E. Lubich."
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
WHAT ARE STUDENTS LOANS WORTH?
The thing that I am wondering is when students will demand their money back plus compensation for wasting so many years of their life learning stuff that is clearly wrong.
<><><>
THE EUT IN THE UK
This may or may not happen as it is due to take place in Norfolk and so off the 'beaten track' as far as alternative scientific investigation goes and so at this early time in England for the cosmology a bit ambitious, but good luck to them and I hope it does happen.
<><><>
THE KESHE FOUNDATION'S LATEST GENERATOR
After waiting for someone to really test the new Keshe Foundation electrical generator we now have at least one person who has built and tested it over a seven day period.
I have had reports though from South America that it does work and if these turn out to be the case, then I will of course put it these up next month.
<><><>
<><><>
SCIENTISM SHALL GO NO FURTHER
As we move forward into the 21st century, more and more people are now climbing on board the unmovable blockade that is derailing the gravy-train of exceptionally poor fiction and which is known as the 'standard model'.
This is because they are now coming to know that it isn't Real Science, but instead is nothing more than totally ridiculous fantasy built around contorted mathematical gibberish.
&
<><><>
REMOVING SALT FROM WATER
Water is drawn up in the gas state of matter at the mid point between the North and South Poles of the Earth. The water gas then starts to loose energy and condenses into cloud with the energy that was holding it in the gas state then being released as ionic wind.
As the now condensing water vapour (in-between gas and liquid) moves due to the release of the wind, charge coming down from the Sun via our ionosphere and which mainly grounds around the poles, is then attracted to the water vapour due to its salt content and vortexes are formed.
These individual current filaments then drill their way through the dielectric atmosphere further releasing the salt as the vapour turns to liquid with more wind being created.
*
ALTERING THE WEATHER BY DESIGN
The insurance business like any other is there to make a profit and give their company owners and nice little earner. So this is why they have clauses in the contracts to say that if your property is damaged by 'Acts of God' then they can laugh in your face and tell you to go away and not pay out.
So with recent flooding that has swamped the UK and elsewhere, it is most essential that it is regarded as natural disasters rather then being man made geo-engineering.
Attempts in trying out ideas in different forms and by different agencies, as well as by different individuals, have been going on for well over a hundred years and not just the odd idea either.
&
Heat/Cold are relative and just a radiation from the electricity grounding and with the returning circuit, driving the whole Earth system. How we pollute that system will have an effect on how that system then adjusts to its changing electromagnetic environment.
Because the atmosphere works like a dielectric in a capacitor, it is grounding charge between the poles of ionosphere and Earth. So any conductive matter pollution put into the atmosphere is of concern to me.
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
EXTRATERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS
<><><>
Disclaimer- All outside writings and links are the thoughts and opinions of the authors and not necessarily that of 'The Multiverse'.
