latest multiversal news & commentWELCOME TO THE FUTURE
(BECAUSE IT SEEMS, YOU CAN’T RELY ON THE MAIN STREAM)
*
Just released by ESA- While they discuss what is to be done with Philae, it seems like they are now focusing on what Rosetta will be upto over the next year, which will of course also be as fascinating as it too will help prove the EUT is correct, or at the very least a 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion times closer than that of the 'standard model'.
TIMES SQUARE
LANDING ON A COMET
It might get down but I don't think the lander will be sticking in one place and might end up being a bit of a rover, but I wish all the luck in a comet to Philae, may your adventure be a fruitful one.
<><><>
MARS LATEST
NOT UNSURPRISINGLY THE OFFICIAL PHOTOS AND VIDEOS OF COMET SIDING-SPRING FLY PAST OF MARS SHOWED- NOT A LOT
&
NOW ADMITTED AND AS PREDICTED BY THE EUT- COMETS ARE ELECTRICALLY CHARGED
After waiting and waiting it has been virtually admitted that all is not well with the various vehicles on the surface and in orbit around Mars. The first indication of this is that they still haven't released any photographs and only 'artists illustrations', then there comes the text-
"All the Mars orbiters used the planet as a shield during the comet’s closest approach — and it’s a good thing they did. While earlier observations suggested that the spacecraft would have been safe where they were during the comet flyby, subsequent measurements of the Martian atmosphere indicate that the probes could have been damaged in the surprising onslaught of dust and ice grains."
CLICK
&
NASA
"Mars Express spacecraft have revealed that debris from the comet added a temporary and very strong layer of ions to the ionosphere, the electrically charged layer high above Mars."
CLICK
It is just as well then that we got some telescopes outside of the big boys filming the event because officially and after all the hype of having ring side seats, we got virtually nothing. After watching independent astronomy live events from first Italy and then America a bit later and with nothing spectacular happening (apart from some nice chat from the presenters) as far as we could see, I went to bed and didn't get up again in the middle of the night to get the update.
The next morning I was looking through my normal channels when I came across the Tenerife telescope footage from on top of the mountain on Tenerife and it appeared to give us even more than even those in the EUT community were hoping for.
From the footage we could see that comet had passed Mars on the right hand side away from the Red Planet when BOOM happened on the side facing earth. I found a Solar System orbital map to see where the two Moons were and especially Phobos which is a lot closer to the planets surface in its orbit and sure enough at about the time of the flash it was in the right place at the time as reported by the observatory. So this is what I think was the turn of events if it correct as filmed.
Having been given the rough window of when the light show happened from the YouTube description, it gave me a time period for the event.
So having looked at the geometry, it seems like this is might well be the turn of events if there was a discharge centered around Mars, as the footage suggests. The CME from Sun-spot 1292 hit the comet and Mars plus moons charging them all up to some extent. A time later the Mars system would have entered the recently passed comet’s highly charged tail.
Phobos’ orbit would then bring it directly in between Mars and Earth in straight line geometry, Mars then discharged to Phobos. If this is the case then as well as Mars being scared we should also see clear evidence on left hand side of Phobos looking at it end on towards the Stickney crater.
It is interesting to note that all the satellites would have been on the same side of Mars as the discharge to shield them from the dust from the comet's dust. This then begs the question how much do they really know. It has assumed that NASA and the rest have always known more than they let on (i.e. the electromagnetic effects in space) but if this is the case then they would have not put the satellites near to Phobos would they? But then again where would they put them, being in danger from the comet's dust and an EM effect to Phobos.
<><><>
12th NOVEMBER 2014: THE ROSETTA COMET PROBE WILL ATTEMPT TO PUT DOWN THE PHILAE LANDER- & STAY THERE IN ONE PLACE
Dr. Fred Whipple showing off his idea at Harvard: The 'dirty snowball' theory.
In 1950 the American astronomer Fred Whipple originally came up with the idea that comets were a loose collection of dust and small rock debris left over from the formation of the solar system and was being held together with a conglomerate of ice containing water, methane, ammonia, carbon dioxide and so in other words was nothing more than big ‘dirty snowballs’.
This was than agreed on to be fact by those at the top of scientism and so was then decreed to be and taught as fact. Another leap backwards in the same year was when it was also decided that the idea of Johannes Oort (famous for his Oort cloud) was also undoubtedly correct.
Even though still to this day there is absolutely no evidence that traditional speculation is anything other than totally wrong, because they were built on the wrong assumptions that we live in a purely nuclear and gravity driven electrically inert universe, the facts gained since then have shown the original guesswork to be very far from being correct, it is still regarded as absolute and undoubted truth and so is taught in our educational institutions and through the Main Stream Media as such.
Personally I don’t get how this way of working can in any way be regarded as at all rational, logical or even scientific. It certainly doesn’t follow any scientific method that I am aware of and because of the relentless push for truth from outside of the main stream, this is now a trying time for those in the Main Stream Media as well as the quasi religious cult of scientism and especially those in its hierarchy.
Where as only a few of years ago all in the garden was rosy (pre the Sacred Tree), now though there is a distinct chill wind blowing through the world of imagined reality and so is heralding wintry times ahead for them. This situation can only now get worse for those in scientism as more and more people find out that what we are told as truth quite often isn't.
Where as once scientism could rely on the Main Stream Media to paper over the gaping chasms in the ‘standard theory’ and so keep the populous ignorant of their massive failings, now we have the Free Media where people are becoming self informed and becoming aware of how the tax payer has been completely coned over the decades.
As stated many times by those in the Electric Universe Theory community, comets are not a loose conglomerate of icy fluff as predicted by the fundamentalists of scientism, but are in stead made of silicate (solid rock) which is oxygen rich and when hit by the solar wind and CMEs (which is charged hydrogen particles), we will see hydroxides (OH) and virgin water (H2O) as the charge arcs on the rock and fuses the two elements together.
These molecules will then travels back up the vertical discharge path (arcs are always ninety degrees to the strike surface) and so create curtains of Birkeland Currents just like in the Auroras.
Back in May I suggested that because the lander was designed and launched over ten years ago and its design was based on the comet being a soft ‘dirty snowball’ it would fail to secure itself to the rock. This was not hard to come up with though, because I don’t automatically believe in scientism’s doctrine and tenet and actually question what is being reported as undeniable fact.
Some may say scientism is just a harmless cult, but I think it is actually very dangerous and especially when it has been proved time and again how it burns massive holes in the tax payer’s pocket, let alone corrupting the minds of our young.
It has now been suggested that the comet might have some sort of soil on the surface of the comet but personally I don't see that there would be too much soil as when the comet was blasted from a planetary body there wouldn't be enough gravity from the comet to make any planet soil to stick to the rock.
There might well be though some top soil now though but would have been produced by the continuing arcing that has gone on in the comets life and so there might be a covering the surface as it electromagnetically stuck to the comet’s surface, just like how we coat objects on earth. This process is called sputtering.
MY FINAL ANALYSIS OF WHAT WILL HAPPEN
This won’t be the same as the ‘deep impact’ mission as that was designed to just arrive at the comet and then straight away smash the detachable part of the probe into the comet at a very high speed. This means that the electrical potential would have been different between the comet and the probe.
The Rosetta mission though has now been in orbit for about six month and so the electrical potential will be the same. Also Philae, the lander part of this probe has been designed to touch down on the comet and stay there.
Even though it will not be an extremely explosive impact like before, I wouldn’t be surprised to see some sort of disruption to the electronics on board the Lander and even some form of a small discharge to the lander as it nears the surface due to the comet having attracted more and more charge as it nears the Sun compared to make up of the Lander being an aluminized carbon fibre honeycomb cylinder. But I really don’t expect the discharge to be that big if there is one at all.
What I do expect though should be just as interesting as before, but for completely different reasons. Because Rosetta was designed and launched on its journey a decade ago, it was designed to set down on a conglomerate of soft icy fluff (‘dirty snowball’) that is melting and so has been constructed to encounter this type of surface and not an arcing rock.
It has been designed to make a slow decent to the surface and once it touches down fire a pneumatic gun which will release a harpoon into the soft ice to secure it and stop it bouncing about. But because comets are solid lumps of rock instead with possibly a thin layer of rock dust covering its surface, I can’t see anything other than the harpoon failing to do its job and will simply bounce off the comet with the possibly of it even spearing itself, or if there is a thicker layer of dust on the surface, to just pulling straight out again.
The probe has also been fitted with ice screws in its feet to also anchor itself down, but once again they have been designed to work on ice, so will have real difficulty with a rock hard surface that they were not designed for.
So if it makes it down without any major electrical event, I can’t see it being secure and might just slip about or even roll over and might even get blown about by an ion wind caused by the increasing arcing as the comet nears the sun.
It has been confirmed that the attempted landing site is going to be ‘J’
&
Although the Lander part (Philae) of the Rosetta probe is expected to fail to secure itself to the comet due to the original guesswork being totally wrong as to what comets are, the mission as a whole has been a fantastic piece of engineering success and the engineers who built it must be whole heartedly congratulated for getting it there and achieving orbit around the very fast moving rock.
It has given us never before close up views of what a comet nucleus looks like and confirms that this type of two rocky lobed shape is perfectly normal both in asteroids, as well as in comets and so, helps to prove their formation has a common origin.
&
<><><>
THUNDERBOLT PROJECT'S PREDICTIONS
“It is often said in the sciences that successful predictions are a good measure of a hypothesis. At present part of our legacy site, the predictions pending and predictions confirmed pages are predictions which are all based on Electric Universe principles.”
&
&
14-16 NOVEMBER 2014
SHERATON PHOENIX DOWNTOWN
PHOENIX, ARIZONA USA
<><><>
HOW TO MAKE A UNIVERSE
<><><>
AT LEAST THEY NOW ADMIT IT
We live in an electrically dynamic environment with our atmosphere being a dielectric between the ionosphere and the Earth, so doing anything with it electrically could be disastrous as it could well unbalance it.
Even if it is done with all good intentions, when those doing it haven’t have a clue how our atmosphere really works because they are totally ignorant to our Electric Universe and just religiously believe in the ‘standard model’ of reality, I personally find this all very concerning.
Plus if one country wants the weather to be one way in their country and another country wants it to be another way in theirs, then fighting over the control of the weather will naturally be the outcome and so can only have in my opinion even more appalling results to us all.
After all it’s not as if irrigating dry areas of land isn’t possible without resulting to messing with our dielectric, But of course our governments with the banking/military/industrial complex telling them what to do, don’t see any profit or important strategic importance in doing it.
&
<><><>
<><><>
&
<><><>
ARE THE EARTH’S MAGNETIC POLES IN THE PROCESS OF REVERSING?
",,,Tens of thousands turns round the sun
Nowhere to go nowhere to run
When the needle points a window to the core
Showing a shift
Getting ready to soar
It matters not how much true grit
Dinosaurs couldn’t find boots big enough to fit..."
I have touched on this before and seeing how the info coming in is continually saying this, I will of course be keeping an interesting eye on it to try and gauge what any likely affects it will have on our planet and all its inhabitants.
It seems that the Pole Flip (if that is what is happening) is associated with our weakening magnetic field, plus with the North Poles now racing towards the Siberian Flux Node this is what I always thought might be happening, I have constantly argued that if it did happen then it would much better for it to happen quickly so our magnetic field could reestablish itself also quickly
<><><>
MATH IN BANKING: IS IT A GOOD IDEA?
Now we know that through real physics (Observation, Measurement, Lab Experimentation & Prediction that proves correct) math can’t predict anything and can only just come up with poorly imagined gobbledygook, what harm can they do in the world of finance?
Mathematics is of course really important but for only describing and possibly expanding on something that has been proved by physics, so we must ask the question, what affect will it have on our banking system now the mathemagicians are running the show there too?
Most people are totally unaware that since the collapse of the banking system in 2008, the mathemagicians have really taken over and have since then been able to start wielding their magic wands and come up with incantations that gave themselves a nice little earner.
When the banking crisis happened in 2008 our governments were so stunned and were so totally lost to what to do, they out of desperation sanctioned the banks decision to come up with some magic.
But now because no one outside the magic circle can understand how these incantations work, no one is able to now disagree with them.
The formulas that were envisaged and then implemented were similar to those that came up with the ridiculous notion of a black hole and so will inevitably lead us to the same fate as where traditional science is today. Unless something is done to remedy and save the monetary situation, just like the EUT is doing in the world of science, I can’t see the immediate future being that rosy.
Because the banking system relies so heavily on confidence and due to the fact that they have been proved to be less than useless in predicting anything right in the world of science, this has now left our governments in some what of a quandary and why it will now become a lot harder for us to return to a truth mentality.
If our governments via their mouth pieces the MSM admit that traditional science is wrong and the EUT is correct, then they will also have to admit that those who they gave control to and are now in control of our economies, can and will only eventually make matters worse and then confidence in the system will add to the all ready dire situation..
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
DAN WINTER: BIOLOGIC ARCHITECTURE
When creating spaces that we live and work in, we must consider how the electromagnetic effect will impinge on out health, both mentally as well as physically, so architects should really take note of shape and composition of the materials used.
<><><>
<><><>
IF YOU ARE A CONSPIRACY THEORIST THEN YOU ARE MAD, RIGHT?
Well actually the answer is no and it was only George Bush and his colleagues (including the Main Stream Media) who associated the phrase with lunacy after all the many, many anomalies where pointed out (but ignored by the MSM) in the official story of the 9/11 atrocity.
In order to deflect the public from questioning the incident as to the cause, he made it in the public's eye (thanks to the MSM) the wrong way of thinking and just believe wholeheartedly those who had got themselves into power and authority over the rest of us.
&
<><><>
BASALT FRAGMENTS FOUND IN SEDIMENTARY ROCK IN GAIL CRATER ON MARS
A Conglomerate rock on Earth is a rock that is made up from smaller rock fragments bound up together to make the new sedimentary rock. But even though the basalt rock staying chemically the same when it becomes part of a conglomerate rock doesn’t happen readily on earth to any extent, main stream scientists say this is what has been found on Mars and in very large amounts.
The problem with sedimentary rocks made out of basalt fragments is that sedimentary rock need to have flowing water to form and water changes the chemical composition of basalt and so the basalt fragments should no longer be basalt, but they are.
Basalt is dark in colour and made from melt, it is mainly made from green olivine and pyroxene which are both rich in iron and magnesium. It also contains grey feldspar which consists of calcium and sodium. And by percentage is low in silicon, potassium and aluminium.
Water attacks chemically the crystalline structure of olivine, pyroxene and feldspar and because it is full of iron, it makes it basically rust. This makes the basalt turn from dark grey or green to red and when it is running water, it will leach out the iron, magnesium and calcium and so make it silicon and aluminium heavy. So even though the conglomerate rock on Mars suggests that it is made from water and so is sedimentary, the lumps of Basalt which are still rich in green olivine, pyroxene and feldspar shows it isn't.
But rather than looking for another explanation as to why the conglomerate rocks still had the basalt rock fragments, observation and measurement was overlooked in favour of doctrine and what was believe to be true,
Basalt is dark in colour and made from melt, it is mainly made from green olivine and pyroxene which are both rich in iron and magnesium. It also contains grey feldspar which consists of calcium and sodium. And by percentage is low in silicon, potassium and aluminium.
Water attacks chemically the crystalline structure of olivine, pyroxene and feldspar and because it is full of iron, it makes it basically rust. This makes the basalt turn from dark grey or green to red and when it is running water, it will leach out the iron, magnesium and calcium and so make it silicon and aluminium heavy. So even though the conglomerate rock on Mars suggests that it is made from water and so is sedimentary, the lumps of Basalt which are still rich in green olivine, pyroxene and feldspar shows it isn't.
But rather than looking for another explanation as to why the conglomerate rocks still had the basalt rock fragments, observation and measurement was overlooked in favour of doctrine and what was believe to be true,
As we have seen Gail crater is a typical electrically formed crater with its typical lack of impact debris, central raised formation with sharp mountain peak and sharp crater rim.
<><><>
TOY MAKERS LEGO OF SHELL
After a concerted effort by Greenpeace and others to stop the tie up between Lego and the oil extractors that is planning to possibly make a very big mess of the Antarctic, the builders of the humble block toy have decided the bad publicity was not doing their image any good and so have now decided to not renew their marketing arrangement with the oil giants.
&
<><><>
HOW SIMPLISTIC IS NATURE?
Mesembryanthemum criniflorum mixed
Having now looked at different people's explanations as to the atomic world, I am still not settled with how I see it but I do like the simple concept that Wal Thornhill goes with, being just electricity running through a neutrino sub structure until it hits normal matter when it organizes itself into structure that we experience by way of the magnetic fields that the electricity produces.
But I am also looking at some other ideas put forward by some others who comment on the associated Facebook page (see Right Side-Bar at the Bottom) which dismiss the idea that neutrinos actually exist and that it is wrong interpretation of data and what we should be looking elsewhere.
So this further exploration also includes looking down the road of Fluid Mechanics which studies the stillness, the motion and especially in this case, the effects of forces on liquids, gases and ionized gas (plasma). But will the free moving electrical charge that makes plasma what it is, change the dynamics of Fluid Mechanics?
Because this branch of Quantum Mechanics does away with matter at the very small level (neutrinos) it can only be resolved with very complicated mathematical calculations and has even been termed a ‘super’ fluid. This field of study comes under the general heading of Sorce Theory and like all branches of ‘unknown at the moment’ enquiry, has both its fans and its opponents.
SORCE THEORY
&
<><><>
EAR PLUGS?
In his unassuming quiet little way Mr. Celente gives he opinion. He isn’t exactly liked by the main stream and this is due to him not following the script that the MSM like to obediently pump out to the masses.
<><><>
<><><>
LUNANAUTS AND GETTING THERE
Ever since it was reported that the human race had landed on the Luna surface, there have been suspicions that man has ventured no further than earth’s orbit. Others believe we got into orbit around the moon but didn't achieve an actual landing.
This accusation has always been hotly deigned because apart from it being a political and social nightmare for the country and its ego, it is also a good little money earner after all the heavy investment in getting man off the ground and into space and so, has always been hotly disputed by NASA.
This accusation has always been hotly deigned because apart from it being a political and social nightmare for the country and its ego, it is also a good little money earner after all the heavy investment in getting man off the ground and into space and so, has always been hotly disputed by NASA.
As a kid I was always fascinated by space and space flight. So naturally I had an Airfix Models Lunar Lander among the models and it this and its dimensions that made me first question the reality as it was being told to me as fact.
On the later missions, how were they suddenly able to fit a big car on board, in between the rocket motor and fuel tanks. No I thought really, was the car landing's hoaxed?
Then in 1977 a film was launched in our cinemas which showed us that some others had thought that every Apollo Mission was a sham.
02:03:54
One of the most embarrassing moments in the space-faring history is the NASA spokesman that said absolutely nothing by just deigning the charge of fakery. In my opinion the evidence is certainly there to have the opinion that it was ‘Cold War’ one upmanship against the USSR after a series of coming second in various space endeavors.
Another problem with the story is that they went straight out to the moon from the Earth and didn’t detour via one of the poles and so not have to touch the deadly Van Allen Belts that surround the Earth. This is because if they did go straight out through the belts, they should quickly secom to radiation sickness.
The Space craft would really need about five foot of lead shielding to safely transport people through it. The trajectory of the route to the moon that I've seen does suggest that they didn't go through the thickest part of the belts, but towards the pole where the belts were getting thinner. But still, none of the lunanaughts have ever seemed to suffer from radiation related illness at any time since getting back from their epic flights.
As we have seen over the last week, with two different commercial rocket ship failures this week, space flight is a risky business and anyone who is lucky enough to achieve it, can certainly be regarded as epic.
As we have seen over the last week, with two different commercial rocket ship failures this week, space flight is a risky business and anyone who is lucky enough to achieve it, can certainly be regarded as epic.
&
&
&
BUT WHAT ABOUT THE SOIL WE HAVE FROM THE MOON
Even though there is loads of discrepancies as to whether man achieved the feat of landing on the Moon, does this mean that providing the lunanaughts survived going through the Van Allan Belts, some sort of robotic probe wasn't sent down from a manned orbiter to the surface instead and then returned with soil samples? At this time the moon landings are still full of inconsistencies and so this will be an ongoing situation as to trying to find out what actually happened.
<><><>
THE ELECTROMAGNETIC FORCE
Einstein’s ‘relativities’ both work to a point but as it has been seen, they are very far from complete and so in my humble opinion, should be regarded with suspicion when trying to equate them reality.
If I got myself a horse with only three legs, yes I would be able to sort of ride it down the road, but when it comes to trying to jump over a fence blocking my path at the end of the lane, then the exercise would quickly show itself as being extremely floored and that is with only 25% missing from the horse’s running-gear.
Because he surmised that he didn’t need to include electricity into his calculations and wanted to only use gravity as a universe making force, he missed the answer by a factor of 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion to 1, so in my eyes it is far enough out to be regarded as a fail despite the odd bit that may work.
WHO WAS IMMANUEL VELIKOVSKY?
This name is often mentioned in Electric Universe Theory circles but who was he and what was he all about?
&
So is it just a coincidence that when scientists use Einstein’s equations they usually refer to them in their geometric form, which is of course an electrical signature. When looking at craters or indeed plasma clouds, like at the North Pole of Saturn...
...you can tell how high the charge is that cause them to form by their shape. Low charge produces the circle, as the charge increases so does the constricting electromagnetic field. As the EM field increases it starts to straighten out the sides of the discharge channel walls. As the EM field gets stronger and stronger the geometric angles gets less until the electricity eventually squares the circle.
GEOMETRIC SHAPES ALL OVER THE PLACE
Because electricity is totally scalable, as well as being seen in the small Helicon crater, geometric shapes associated with electrical activity can also be seen on the bigger scale. Of course the main-stream are still going with the thinking that there was a mechanistic cause to all the straight line and angled geometry seen all over the universe.
SMASHING THE MYTH OF 'MASS BENDING LIGHT ON A FLAT BIT OF CLOTH'
“Einstein’s geometric theory of general relativity makes no real sense whatsoever. It leaves more unanswerable questions than it appears to solve. How, precisely, does matter have an effect on empty space? Nobel Prize nominee, the late Professor C. L. Kervran, stated the problem: “..the word “matter” has no exact meaning; we just do not know what matter is; we do not know what a proton or electron is made of; the word only serves to cloak our ignorance. Matter has not been proved to come from energy.”
In addition, the concept of curved or ‘warped’ empty space has no physical reality. It is a purely mathematical concept where the word ‘dimension’ has a broader meaning than mensuration. It seems that the esoteric theoretical geometry of general relativity may have defeated Einstein too. A fellow Australian has issued a quite simple and specific, yet unanswered, mathematical challenge to hundreds of experts. His conclusion? “The relativists have all fatally erred in their analysis of black holes and relativistic cosmology.* General Relativity does not predict black holes or expansion of the Universe with or without a big bang.” The stark nakedness of our ‘emperors of science’ underlines the power of myth to blind us to reality. Mercury’s perihelion advance is telling us something different. But no one can see that—yet.”
<><><>
ELECTRICITY IN NATURE
A plant will only grow above the ground from what can be sustained and fed from below and both the root and main plant growth if a Lichtenberg figure just like throughout nature and yes it seems that a change in electricity sparks mutation, evolution and change.
<><><>
PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS GET IT RIGHT
When I was a child I was taught that heat rises and through experimentation that proved to be the case. So it was always a bit of a conundrum when scientist and Main Stream Media started to tell us that in the case of global warming the heat in the oceans actually sank to the bottom of the ocean.
<><><>
<><><>
TRADITIONAL SCIENCE SLOWLY CATCHES UP: WATER COMES FROM CHARGE PARTICLES
As we have seen from as far back as 2005 when NASA didn’t know what they were looking at but Wal Thornhill did, now some nine years later they are beginning to figure it out.
As well as charged particles hitting silicates producing hydroxyls and virgin water, it is also formed by hydrogen plasma hitting oxygen in atmospheres.
<><><>
&
&
<><><>
<><><>
LET THERE BE LIGHT
Because the main stream press has had their fingers burnt in the past with their reporting which has been proved to be adding in deceit, they are now holding back in how they reporting such claims. Rather than confidently saying things are fact they now say things like ‘…according to their press release…’
Although the reporting shows little critical thinking in what is being reported at least they don’t automatically now call it fact. It is a shame though that the reporters don’t have the capacity to know what physics means and look at the evidence from an electric perspective to try to see what is going on.
With any reports on so called scientific discoveries, one must start with separating direct physical evidence from what is being observed and then being just attributed to preconceived guesswork especially when it contradicts something else.
From an Electric Universe perspective visible light is just a small part of the electromagnetic spectrum but this section of the spectrum is said to be both a wave and a particle so we must ask why we don’t ever hear of a gammaton or X-Rayaton? Yes it can be explained by the math why visible to humans light is different, but the 'bending of light by mass on a flat bit of cloth' just doesn't work for me.
Apart from being 1000, billion, billion, billion, billion times stronger than gravity, the electromagnetic force is almost instantaneous and is why things at great distance can appear to be connected by entanglement.
A quartz watch is piezoelectricity which means when the crystal inside is distorted it will separate the negative and positive charge in the atomic structure to either side of the crystal and when is relaxed the charge will come back together and energy is released.
Because only electrical charge produces the electromagnetic spectrum and the science reporters obviously don’t know this, how piezoelectricity or even quartz watches work, their only course of action is to distance themselves from the press release as they report it.
There are so many discrepancies with this report, it will (if they can see past the pseudo religious doctrine) even make school children ask what is going on. The first thing to make one question what is reported, is that part of the electromagnetic wave spectrum can obliterate another electromagnetic wave and one of things I was taught at school was that waves travel through each other. This can be simply proved by turning on a radio and be able to pick up all the different stations.
As we have seen over the months electricity can be transported through magnetic fields to power electrical devises without touching them. So electricity produces a magnetic field which can then transport the electricity with its accompanying electromagnetic waves to other receptors and so has nothing to do quantum entanglement.
“You could stare at the equations of motion all day and you will not see this possibility. We’ve all been taught that this doesn’t happen,” said Rand, an author of a paper on the work published in the Journal of Applied Physics. “It’s a very odd interaction. That’s why it’s been overlooked for more than 100 years.”
<><><>
CONFIRMED: ONE OF THE CORNER STONES OF TRADITIONAL SCIENCE IS NOT CONSTANT WHEN IT HAS TO BE
Due to the continuing mind set in traditional science, it has spawned all sorts of fantasy driven ideas derived from elegantly crafted math. But now in an effort to catch up with those scientists and researchers who indulge in real physics, more and more of what was once regarded by the main stream as only the topic of cranks, it is now a growing cranky mind set that is based in real science.
Seemingly to reinforce the existing paradigm of a purely mechanistic and gravity driven universe, the first paragraph still spells out in rather long winded terms, the doctrine of the ‘standard model’.
This traditional quasi religious like belief in tenet is also further reinforced by talking about finding mountains under the sea. So instead of getting down to the real issue of why there is an inconsistency in the gravitational thinking that says that ‘light bends by mass on a flat piece of cloth’, rather than Electric Universe Theory saying that it is a separation of charge through matter, it obviously coming from a doctrine starting position and so stating that so not to offend the hierarchy of scientism.
Even in the EUT community, not everyone sees the level of the very small the same, not everyone automatically agrees with each other. Some say that mater on the atom level matter is a vortex of energy that seems solid. I always sore the dipole of the electron being a torus vortex but the nucleus as well?
It does eventually get to the important stuff though after we have scrolled down the page to see the real picture that has emerged and that is, that there is even more evidence to say that the ‘standard model’ is crumbling fast.
From an electrical perspective, because gravity is a by-product of the electromagnetic force and that we know charge is not constant (hence the need for capacitors to smooth the flow of charge), it is expected to be different depending on the type of matter it is working on and through and the type of mass being present. So it will naturally attract different amounts of charge, so we would expect gravity to be far from constant.
So rather than follow the doctrine of Tectonic Plates, we should also be looking at the world as being simply cracked, with a massive expansion of the earth happening through the cracks as magma created new ocean floor. The ocean floors say that this started to happen about 200 million years ago.
&
<><><>
SEEING THE PRESENCE OF ELECTRICITY
Follow up to the Aligned Nebular video. Apart from clearly seeing the plasma Z-Pinch in a bipolar nebular, we also see magnetic fields and there is only one thing that makes magnetic fields and that is electricity. This research is presented in a paper entitled "Alignment of the Angular Momentum Vectors of Planetary Nebulae in the Galactic Bulge", to appear in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
<><><>
<><><>
STEPHEN CROTHERS THOUGHT OF THE MONTH
Stephen liked a man named Joel and my equation for a black hole- ‘n/0 = ∞’ or in other words, 'anything divided by nothing equals for ever without end'.
<><><>
&
<><><>
<><><>
UK SPACE WEATHER RESOURCE
Plus it’ll be interesting to see how they now in more detail, still largely ignore electricity while still talking about its companion magnetism, which can only be produced by a separation of charge.
So when one sees the Sun/Earth connection from an electrical perspective which of course makes the magnetism, we find that it makes things a lot simpler with a lot less guesswork.
so I am eager to see whether this turns out to be another unnecessary white elephant like CERN, or has anything new to add to what we already know in the alternative reality of an Electric Universe Theory.
I actually do hope it turns out to be a brilliant resource for us all though, it cost the Tax Payer a bit of dosh to set up and as a complex, it definitely looks like a decent bit of kit that can be utilised so in the right hands it should be stomping succeed.
<><><>
OF THE MOON & MARS
<><><>
&
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
ANTI MATTER?
Last month I said that the EUT does not automatically deny the existence of other realms with extra dimensional entities, so what evidence do we have that unseen realms exist. The ‘standard model’ of course has lots of stuff that can’t be seen, so how is this different?
Most would have heard of Anti-matter but from an EUT perspective and according Wal Thornhill is actually Mirror Matter (also known as Shadow & Alice Matter). Mirror Matter is another theoretical particle that is produced under certain circumstances and is like a 2 dimensional copy.
Wal Thornhill- "The Eu has no problem with this except the use of the prefix "anti-" which is nonsense. It is mirror matter that can recombine with normal matter to release the energy involved in forming it and returning it to the a neutrino plenum which is the material substrate to the universe, also known as the æther.
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
&
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
EXTRATERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
<><><>
*
Because humanity is now maturing out of its adolescence stage of development, the politics of events on earth cannot be separated from the politics of the intergalactic. This is because the decisions and actions that the power brokers that run the earth now make will show directly how they are likely to act when dealing with any intergalactic & interdimensional neighbours.
In the mine field of information and disinformation ‘The Multiverse’ endeavours to synthesise the many fields that make up our conscious perception of the universe., while at the same time, filtering out that which is fantasy as well as that which is deliberately put out to muddy of the waters of reality. The views and opinions offered by outside contributors & links are purely their own and are not necessarily those of ‘The Multiverse’.
If you are viewing this on a hand held device then you will getting only the posts and not the side bars. This is because after testing, the Desk Top version got clunky and didn’t really work with the mobile devices. To see the info in the side-bars please view on a desk-top computer.
*
