latest
multiversal news & comment
*
Because humanity is now
maturing out of its adolescence stage of development, the politics of events on
earth cannot be separated from the politics of the intergalactic. This is
because the decisions and actions that the power brokers that run the earth now
make will show directly how they are likely to act when dealing with any
intergalactic & interdimensional neighbours.
In the mine field of
information and disinformation ‘The Multiverse’ endeavours to synthesise the
many fields that make up our conscious perception of the universe., while at
the same time, filtering out that which is fantasy as well as that which is
deliberately put out to muddy of the waters of reality. The views and opinions
offered by outside contributors & links are purely their own and are not
necessarily those of ‘The Multiverse’.
If you are viewing this on a
hand held device then you will getting only the posts and not the side bars.
This is because after testing, the Desk
Top version got clunky and didn’t really work with the mobile devices. To see
the info in the side-bars please view on a desk-top computer.
*
18/03/14 NEW COMMENT: THE MISSING AIRLINER
Although I don't think it has gone into another dimension like some people have suggested, the location is rather close to the Devil's Triangle which has been plotted on the earth grid and so a potent electromagnetic hotspot. Although the disappearance was to the south west of the triangle it was very close to the equator and between the Devil’s Triangle and another Hotspot that runs down to South Africa. At the point where it crosses another grid line that runs through the Northern tip of Australia and up to India.
CLICK
With the increase in electricity that is getting through from the ionosphere now and which has been stirring our weather, I have been wondering since a day or so after the plane vanished if this might be the cause. With the Aurora Borealis being seen in the lower latitudes of the UK at the end of February we know that the Solar Flair that had hit the Earth had juiced up the earth’s magnetic field.
CLICK
A big electrical discharge with an associated EM pulse could knock out all the electronics on the plane if it was caught in a vortex running down from the ionosphere to the earth. The force would have to punch a hole through skin of the aircraft first though otherwise the plane will act as a Faraday cage with the charge running around the airframe and doing no harm.
There have been many examples of ships and planes suddenly vanishing over the years in this vicinity for no apparent reason so I am suggesting that they could also be electrical vortex phenomena dragging them down to their doom.
Although we usually think of electrical events as lightning, this is not the only electrical event that happens atmospherically, Tornadoes/Waterspouts are other examples (which can also be seen on Mars in the Dust Devils). But the evidence doesn’t suggest this being a downing that happened straight away as it seems now that after having the radio and location transponder turned off, the plane then carried on for some considerable time.
Electricity likes to ground itself to earth through water as is seen with the Waterspouts over Lake Michigan and also the Catatumbo lightning that happens in Venezuela and this has lead me to conclude as to why Hurricanes loose power as they make landfall, with the change of matter from liquid to solid suddenly dissipating their strength.
CLICK
Electricity is the major component in changing one type of matter into another. Take iced water for instance. By inputting electricity into it, it melts and becomes water, put in more energy and it becomes vapor, put in even more and it becomes plasma.
Although not generally known about, the world energy grid is known about in the free media and so the location of the planes disappearance must be looked at in relation to the solar flare that hit the earth.
CLICK
It has also been noted that certain other flying craft have also had EM effects on normal aircraft, although I think this one wasn't this type of incident but it does show how EM fields can get through a Faraday Cage.
CLICK
If the disaster was caused by an extreme electrical event whether internal or external, then it might well have started some sort of electrical fire. In order to find the circuit that was causing the fire the pilot would have to remove the circuits one by one and so communication and the transponder would have been disabled as well in the process. After this if the fire got very severe, then the smoke could well have rendered the crew and passengers unconscious with the plane flying on auto pilot until the fuel ran out.
CLICK
Of course with an electrically active ionosphere, any auroral research program that was running might well be a dangerous thing to be experimenting with in the days just after an electrical sun event.
WELCOME TO AN ELECTRIC FUTURE
Not that it’s ever been not here, just kept hidden from students &
the general public.
I was invited to attend and give
my Laymen’s introduction talk to those who are completely new to this paradigm of
an Electric Universe, but unfortunately due to financial restraints I will not
be able to make it, so I wish all the others that will be able to attend all
the very best and a wonderful time.
Hopefully I will be able to get
over in 2015 but in the mean time I am still available for bookings in the UK ,
if you can take my particular style of delivery (i.e. relaying provable facts
rather than the traditional extremely bad guess work).
Because the Thunderbolts Project
invited me along in the first place I am now in constant contact with them and
as such, if
you need any information on or what it means to live in an Electric Universe I am in the position to keep you informed of any developments during and after
the event. You can find a mail address for me by clicking ‘View my complete
profile’ at the bottom of the right hand side bar >>>
I have had a discussion with a
certain TV production company in the UK in respect to making a single or series
of programs explaining the new paradigm and in the short term funding my trip
to Albuquerque but after what I thought was a fruitful meeting and even giving
over my script that I use in my presentation, they then refused to answer any
calls, texts or emails and have completely blanked me and I can only now ponder
on the reason for this.
This is obviously a real shame
because I had already discussed this with Dave Talbott over Skype and they were
ready to offer any help with interviews and other info that we would need to
produce the program/s.
Starting at 18:00 MST on the 20th
March 2014 and ending at
17:00
MST (approx) on Monday 24th
March 2014 .
TRADITIONAL ASTRO PHYSICS GUESS WRONG AGAIN
Yes once more as is always the
case, traditional astronomical assumptions gets it completely incorrect and the
advocates of the Electric Universe modal get it completely right. As far back
as 2006 Wal Thornhill predicted what the space probes that were heading for the
edge of the Suns influence (called the heliosphere) would find when they got
there.
On the other hand because
traditional cosmology deals with only the types of matter that make up no more
then 0.1% of all matter in the universe, they guessed badly that the so called
space between planets and stars is electrically neutral and so this definitely
means, that we as a species need to rid ourselves of the past so we can move forward into the future.
And after all these years of
being proved right in their predictions, it is now with little doubt a fact
that we desperately need to have the right people exploring our reality and teaching the following generations and
it is those who are already involved in Electric Cosmology. Of course we
are still at the beginning of this journey and don’t know all the answers yet
but what we do know is that the Electric Universe community know 99.9% more
than the traditionalists.
TRADITIONAL ASTRONOMERS ARE STILL REALLY PLEASED WITH THEIR DETERMINATION
TO APPEAR DUMB
They still haven't got a clue
with the only thing they continually get right being that they are surprised by
what they have observed. Do they really put out this to amuse those in the EU
community?
Of course not, it’s to save their
pay-packets, reputations and convince the public that there is no other proof
of how our reality works and because the Main Stream Media doesn't report on the alternative evidence that is easily to hand, they too must take responsibility for this and so should also be seriously questioned and those responsible, got rid of.
Before watching the next clip
please remember that traditional astrophysics says that super novas are
explosions, which means that by their very nature they are chaotic, go in every
direction and are not at all structured.
This state of affairs though is
now catching up with traditional Cosmology and the MSM, as it is now quite
obvious that they are completely up there own Black Holes with the hierarchy of
scientism having to contradict each other as well as themselves and are
continually surprised by their experimentations due to bad guess work built on
wrong assumptions.
The MSM though see nothing is
wrong with this but instead of questioning these discrepancies, report on it as
if it’s normal to not know what is going on. Even though traditional cosmology
predictions bare no resemblance to reality and have to come up with even more
bazaar explanations as to why they are always wrong, the MSM never question this
but instead report what they are told like good little lap dogs (no offence to lap
dogs intended).
The Speed of Light is a fine
example of this because it is one of the bastions of knowing for certain by the
establishment what makes reality work. But even this is now being called into question
by themselves.
&
<>
PLASMA INSTABILITIES PETROGLYPHS
UNCOVERED BY STORM IN HAWAII
&
<>
THE WORLD IS HAVING SOME ELECTRIC WEATHER
When I first started this blog
many years ago, among the topics I looked at was HAARP and weather modification
in general and was roundly condemned by some people (including some close
friends) as being a conspiracy nut. Well a ‘conspiracy’ is a ‘plan to commit an
act (& quite often illegally) by two or more people’ and a nut is a source
of fruitful protein so I guess they were right but just not quite how they
meant it.
But seeing that our governments
know nothing (or at least admit to knowing nothing) of our Electric Universe,
using any type of wave from the Electromagnetic spectrum be it radio or light, this is now a very dangerous
position for our planet and its ecosystem to be in. How can they mess
around with the EM spectrum in an electrical environment without knowing the
effects and that those effects and that it won’t be massively detrimental to us all? Then
again maybe they do!
And this of course is before
we get on to the fact that they are adding by the thousands of ton, metal
particulates into the atmosphere which is of course is a great conductor of
electricity.
*
&
*
&
*
&
*
&
&
&
<>
CALLING T.I.M.E. ON THE OLD PARADIGM
Be inline with The Independent
Media Exchange and ‘emit’ the future (an electric current runs both ways in a
circuit). It’s where you can gain by not only reading between the lines but
also by seeing the letters (which ever way they are presented) and then sharing
that knowledge.
&
JNO COOK: RECOVERING THE LOST WORLD
“This is, however,
exactly what I will attempt to do with this text: I will try to tell the actual
history of the world and humanity -- in the face of knee-jerk reactions and
spitting noises by those who know better. This is not my story, but the efforts
of a great many other people, and based on evidence in plain view.”
THE INTELLECTUAL MIND?
Because the current state of
affairs in our higher thinking establishments, it has managed to indoctrinate a
closed circuit way of rationalization into nearly all students who go through
the system and so has been since the day of Gaslight and has instilled into
generations of students the mind set of being completely blinkered to any new
ideas as to how the universe works and this is why we still use such outdated
ideas as the basis of cosmology without question.
By teaching what is regarded as
absolute proof by doctrinal rhetoric, it brain washes the student to think that
their way of rationalizing the world is superior to any other way of thinking
and so automatically dismiss anything outside of tenet and so, not even having
the need to do any decent research.
Plus because this way of thinking
is geared up to expanding the ego to think others are less knowledgeable and so
inferior, when a subject is introduced which is outside of tenet and the ego
has no knowledge of, rather than looking lacking, the hypnotized mind set is
deigned that there be no need for such a subject to be looked at and so is automatically
dismissed and so save the inflated ego and doctrine from getting damaged.
They conclude that if others who
have gone through the same indoctrination process don’t bother to look at subject,
then they by association don’t need to either and can by conclusion just say
that it is rubbish because no one else of any note will take them seriously
anyway.
But let’s look at the type of
person in the past that was not classically trained in this way of religious
scientism and so forwarded humanity by being self taught.
&
&
You might get undergraduate
credits with the following 13 week online course but is it going to be relevant,
having only credits in science fiction? In light of the mass of evidence that
we now have that we live in an Electric Universe, should this be allowed to
continue without an alternative theory being offered?
We know this type of teaching is
hypnotic suggestion because they have to use a repeating mantra of nothing
being there in between planets and stars but empty space. This is repeated time
and time again by all traditional sections of science and the MSM to instill in
the viewers the belief that the old outdated way of thinking is correct. This
process is now being known as pseudo scientific dogmatism, or as it more
commonly known, scientism.
In this first lecture Bruce Betts
give an over view as to what is to be expected, like mentioning that there are
magnetic fields on the sun being made by bar magnets and that they somehow
exist under the photosphere to create the loops that we see. But he then
quickly moves on without any explanation as to how this works or how the bar
magnets got there in the first place, this is of course because it is absolute
rubbish.
Like a lot of astrophysics, it
says things as fact without any evidence that this is the right interpretation
and just ploughs on with the worn out model that doesn’t in anyway go with
observational evidence and lab experimentation. This is why they are always
completely surprised by their findings and have to make scientific statements
like ‘we think’ ‘maybe’ and getting a ‘whiff of’.
As opposed to the guess work
built on old guess work that traditional science uses today, the Electric
Universe explanation of reality doesn’t guess first, it looks and then uses
experimentation to find out what is what.
&
It must be remembered though that
not all features on planetary bodies will automatically be electrical in
nature, so we mustn’t fall into the same Black Hole that the so called
intellectuals of the past have done.
Even when your eyes and simple
common sense tells you its right, if the system says you are wrong, ignore them
and stick with what you know to be right, unless some new evidence comes along
and means that you need alter your stance. This is contrary to the hold on to
all out dated ideas at any cost way of thinking that is taught today.
LEAVING THE DINOSAURS BEHIND
If you are one of the new
students who are now finding out about our Electric Universe and are struggling
with how you proceed with your education, then I feel for you. But you are at
the beginning of this evolutional jump and so are better off than the rest but
there will be to say the least some concern at spending what amounts to being a
heap of money on leaning what amounts to being nothing more than very poor
science fiction and so you will be left with the feeling of what to do now.
In the mean time while waiting for
the adjustment period to kick in properly, which I suspect to be about this
time next year, you either change course straight away or carry on with your
current studies while at the same time teaching yourself about how electricity works
in conjunction with the new cosmology.
RUPERT SHELDRAKE’S BANNED TED TALK
After Rupert’s talk, the TED
organization actually banned this talk and removed it from their resource in
order to try and keep the truth away from students and the general public. But
because of the scientific evidence saying that we do live in an Electric
Universe his ideas and experimental science fitted in perfectly with
interacting electromagnetic fields and so spoke at last year’s Thunderbolts
conference.
&
<>
<>
<>
THE SUN GOES THROUGH WARMING &
COOLING TOO
Yes this has
been an ongoing inquiry in the alternative media for some time now. I do my own
weather updates and have been reporting on this for some years and so I have
been waiting to see what this present Solar Cycle was going to do with a
weakening field as a possible precursor to a magnetic flip.
I like
others am now thinking that our weakening field in conjunction with all the
other planets in the Solar System plus influences from our galactic parent are
directly connected to the lack of Sunspots at this maximum cycle. This is
because all of the planets in the solar system have taken on more energy in the
last couple of decades and not just the Earth.
As the
planets get juiced up there is less instability on the Sun’s photosphere and so
less sunspots and so flaring. It’s a shame that we don’t have the data for the
other planets during the Maunder Minimum to make a comparison.
Because of
our weakening magnetic field we know more electricity will get through and we
are seeing a definitely correlation between the weather being more turbulent
and a lack of Sunspots activity with extreme weather records being broken with
every season somewhere on the globe.
For the
last few months I have been in the opinion that electricity is the main driver
of our weather with the High and Low pressure systems being caused not by the
sun's heat (although that will have an effect on the general weather) but by
the electrical connections between the earth and the ionosphere with the Lows
being the down current and the Highs the returning one (although this may be
the other way round).
One thing
is for sure though and that is that the Sun is going through a quiet period at
the moment, so it might even be good that we have a quiet period because with a
weakening field not being able to protect us, any big Solar ejections could
reek havoc here on earth with our modern way of life running on electrical
devices.
<>
EVEN AFTER WHAT THE BANKS HAVE BEEN
EXPOSED TO BE LIKE
&
BITCOIN LATEST
&
&
&
<>
<>
THE GEOMETRY OF LIFE
Apart from the last couple of
minutes when they talk about the sun being nuclear driven, it goes along with
Le Point's lab experiments of shaped magnetic torus fields.
&
<>
THEY’RE ELECTRIC TOO SO YOU JUST HAVE TO
LOVE ‘EM
I acquired a new flat mate last
month. I was removing a sock from the washing hanger when I felt something drop
from the sock and onto my hand and then start to move around.
Yes it was a big house spider
with beautiful brown stripy markings. Because I didn’t jump about and throw it
at the wall in fear but rather enjoyed the unexpected interaction s/he knew
that I wasn’t going to do it any harm, put him/her on the ground and go where
s/he wanted.
So in the time to come as we get
to know each other I am now going to see if s/he wants to go for walks with me.
It could just sit on my shoulder and look really cool as I wander down the road.
<>
<>
IN THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE COMMUNITY
LOOKING AT SPACE WEATHER IN CONJUNCTION WITH EARTH EVENTS IS NOW PERFECTLY
NORMAL
There is definitely less going on
with Sunspots and the associated solar flairs that affects our Earth,
especially as we are now in a period of Solar maximum. But if you read this blog regularly you would
have also seen that I talk about more electricity stirring up our weather
systems as well as geological events such as earthquakes.
&
TWISTERS ON THE SUN
In an Electrical model a swirling
column of matter is electrically driven. On earth the matter is our gaseous
atmosphere. On the sun it’s Plasma.
<>
NIKOLA TESLA
“Only the existence
of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and
its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this
subject is futile and
destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the
universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable
function it plays in the phenomena. My second discovery was of a physical truth
of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in
more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least
anticipation, I consider myself
the original
discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no
energy in matter other than that received from the environment.”
<>
‘RED SHIFT’ & THE BIG BANG: WHY ITS POOR GUESS WORK
&
<>
HOW DOES AN ELECTRIC UNIVERSE FIT IN WITH THINGS LIKE ACUPUNCTURE
Because we know that electricity
is intrinsic to all life from the atom to beyond galaxies, how does an EU go
along with sticking small needles in the body? Electricity gives off X-Rays and
so, if there are lines of electricity running through our bodies as part of how
our bodies work then logically they should be able to be seen with an X-Ray
scanner.
<>
DR. MASARU EMOTO’S RICE
If you know this name you will
now that he is known for his experimentation with water and talking to it, or
rather being nice to it as well rather nasty…
…and was made famous in the film
‘What the bleep do we know’. Although it was well received and infused about in
certain places around the world, in the UK
it was totally ignored by the media and so kept well under the radar. If you
haven’t seen the whole film upto now, then it is well worth taking an hour and
a bit out of you day and clicking the next link.
Since the ground breaking film
that was lost to most people in this country Dr. Emoto’s work went into
exploring if rice when submerged in water and talked to would have any similar
effects.
&
<>
<>
EXTRATERRESTRIAL AFFAIRS
THE QUESTION OF ET
BEING GOOD?
This is a question that I know rather well, as
it is one I have lived with for most of all of my memories and it on the face
of it has done me good, or at least kept me going during the rough times. But
there is a definitely a split between those who have enjoyed their interactions
and those who have been horrified by it.
Others around the world have
reported to have had really bad encounters and so, are there good and bad ones out
there or just all bad as the Gnostics would suggest? But as they point out
themselves, anyone can be given a bit of truth and then get tricked into
thinking that their piece of the puzzle is all encompassing? So have they too
only got it partially correct?
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
HOW RIGHT IS DAVID ICKE?
There are a lot of people who
know that a lot of stuff that Mr. Icke talks about is right but can’t bring themselves
to admitting it openly. This is due to Mr. Icke gatherings being too much like
a well attended religious talk, plus of course there is the question of him thinking that the Queen
and the rest of the Royal Family being reptiles.
*
*
<>
SACRED
<>
<>
Why are our governments cooling
the planet with geo-engineering when all the evidence is that we are heading in
a period of global cooling?
&
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
<>
(including humans)
<>
<>
<>
THE ESOTERIC HISTORY TEACHINGS
When working under the free will
of the higher mind, a Soul fusion is taken place with the personality merging. Part
of this is training is to intuit answers, this hones telepathy skills. Much is
taught in esoteric teaching and some isn’t.
In the worlds of information and
disinformation much is put out to mist reality, either just as individual
points or more complete fabrications. This is used to keep certain individuals
and groups guessing, as well as being part of intuition process to see not only
the intended falsehoods but also understand why.
&
*
<>
<>
THE MATHMAN
MR. Stephen Crothers
&
&
“This is how the
proponents of black holes, big bangs, and Cosmic Microwave Background suppress
the truth.
THE SO-CALLED COSMIC MICRWOAVE BACKGROUND
(1) The doctoring of
the COBE-FIRAS graphs remains unaddressed here by proponents of big bangs and
CMB afterglows thereof, despite Dishman admitting, apparently after subsequent
checking, that data < 2cm^(-1) has been omitted. Dishman initially claimed
that no data < 2cm^(-1) was obtained.
(2) To obtain an
image of the Cosmos we have to peer through the Milky Way, because we are
located within it. The Milky Way radiates, including in the microwave bands. If
it is assumed that there is some Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation,
any raw image of it will contain the radiation from the Milky Way. Any raw
image in microwaves will therefore be contaminated by the radiation fog of the
Milky Way. This fog is not isotropic (i.e. it is not the same in all directions
and not independent of time). It is effectively noise that must be removed from
a raw image.
(3) Any raw image can
be thought of as made up of layers of transparencies. Each transparency
contains part of the raw image. Some layers contain noise and the others
contain the supposed CMB. All the noise layers have to be removed to leave
behind the supposed CMB.
(4) There are two
objectives: (a) to detect the supposed isotropic CMB mean temperature, (b) to
detect the supposed CMB anisotropies. The anisotropies are not uniform, that is
why they are called anisotropies – they are not isotropic. The CMB sky is
expressed as a spherical harmonic expansion. The supposed CMB mean blackbody
temperature at 2.725 K is the monopole component of CMB maps. Monopole
measurements can only be made with absolute temperature devices, such as the
COBE-FIRAS instrument; although this is actually the difference between the sky
and the calibrator on board FIRAS.
(5) The raw image
layers analogy consists of a layer for the anisotropic radiation from the Milky
Way, called the galactic foreground; a layer for the isotropic monopole signal
which is the overall supposed CMB mean temperature; a layer for the anisotropic
dipole signal produced by the motion of the detector with respect to the local
group of galaxies, and which comprises the first spherical harmonic of the
spherical harmonic expansion of the CMB sky; and layers for the supposed
anisotropies buried deep within the alleged CMB and which are due to what are
called the higher order multipoles, such as the quadrupole signal, the octupole
signal, etc. each contributing a separate layer to the raw image. CMB stands
for Cosmic Microwave Background. The alleged isotopic mean temperature is the
monopole signal. Thus, cosmic monopole signal or monopole signal is correct
terminology, especially since it stands in contrast to the actual monopole
signal from the Earth – the Earth monopole signal – which was what Penzias and
Wilson observed from the ground and reported in 1965, and what COBE-FIRAS
detected in low Earth orbit. Rockets and balloons, all in Earth’s atmosphere,
have also detected the Earth monopole signal, because the source is the Earth,
but it has been incorrectly assigned to the Cosmos. That no monopole signal has
been detected at the Second Lagrange Point (L2) some 1.5 million km from Earth
reaffirms that there is no cosmic monopole – the monopole signal detected in
Earth’s atmosphere and in low Earth orbit is the monopole microwave signal
emitted by water on Earth and in Earth’s atmosphere. In the absence of the
cosmic monopole signal all alleged maps of CMB anisotropy are entirely
meaningless.
(6) The galactic
foreground signal is in milli-Kelvin (mK), the monopole signal is supposed to
be ~ 3K, the dipole signal is in mK, and the anisotropies are in micro-Kelvin.
Thus, the supposed anisotropies are 1000 times weaker than the noise (the
galactic foreground signal and the dipole signal are non-uniform noise that fog
the raw image).
(7) The Cosmic
Background Explorer – Far-Infrared Absolute Spectrophotometer (COBE-FIRAS) was
an absolute mode detector. It compared the ‘sky’ with its onboard calibrator.
After data-processing out the galactic foreground and the dipole signal the
FIRAS team reported an alleged remaining CMB with a temperature of 2.725 K.
Recall that they reported in their interferograms an alleged “near null”
between sky and calibrator at 2.759 K, which is far from 2.725 K, and that they
suppressed the amplitudes of the top and bottom traces to give the false
impression that a “near null” was obtained at 2.759 K. But COBE was in Earth
orbit at an altitude of about 950km and it had no protection from extraneous
microwaves. COBE-FIRAS had a shield, but it was only for RF/thermal, not for
microwaves. Microwaves are emitted by water. About 70% of the surface of the
Earth is covered by water and the atmosphere also contains water. Microwaves
emitted from the oceans of the Earth and water in the atmosphere are scattered
by the atmosphere so that in steady state conditions an isotropic bath of
microwaves floods the atmosphere. Microwaves from Earth’s atmosphere is what
the COBE-FIRAS detected, not a cosmic signal. COBE-FIRAS did not detect a
cosmic signal at all. It detected an Earth Microwave Background (EMB).
(8) Also aboard COBE
was the Differential Microwave Radiometers (DMR). You will recall from my
previous post that a differential instrument collects radiation via two
separate antennae and these two detections are compared to one another by means
of subtracting one antenna dataset from the other antenna dataset. Any signal
that is supposed isotropic is the same in both antennae and in all directions
the antennae are pointed and does not vary with time. Consequently, the alleged
CMB monopole signal, which is supposed isotropic, is the same in each antenna
and so when subtracted it disappears from the resulting difference dataset.
Data produced by a differential instrument is difference data. It therefore
does not matter what the temperature of the supposed CMB monopole signal is, it
does not matter if it is blackbody radiation or not, and it does not matter if
it is actually there or actually not there. A differential instrument is blind
to isotropic signals. A differential instrument can only detect anisotropies.
Thus, the COBE-DMR were blind to the monopole signal. Now when George Smoot,
Principal Scientist on the DMR, removed the dipole signal by data-processing,
he puzzled very puzzled as to why his supposed anisotropies did not appear in
his images. After all, if all this processing is well, and there are
anisotropies in the alleged CMB, they should have appeared by then. But they
didn’t. He tried every which way to make them appear, but they didn’t. Finally,
on the spur of the moment, he decided to data-process out the supposed
quadrupole signal. Lo and behold, his anisotropies appeared. Here is what Smoot
(1993) said:
“We were confident
that the quadrupole was a real cosmic signal. . . By late January and early
February, the results were beginning to gel, but they still did not quite make
sense. I tried all kinds of different approaches, plotting data in every format
I could think of, including upside down and backwards, just to try a new
perspective and hoping for a breakthrough. Then I thought, why not throw out
the quadrupole—the thing I’d been searching for all those years — and see if
nature had put anything else there! … “Why, I puzzled, did I have to remove the
quadrupole to see the wrinkles?”
Smoot and his team
were beside themselves with their ‘discovery’. Later Smoot and John Mather
shared a Nobel Prize for all this. However, when Smoot systematically
data-processed out the quadupole signal he systematically introduced ghost
signals into his image. He and his colleagues mistook these data-processing
remnants for data!
Here is Robitaille’s
(2009a) response to Smoot:
“The answer to this
question is one of data processing. The raw maps do not contain any systematic
signal variations on their own. The signals were random in nature. However,
when Smoot and his colleagues imposed a systematic removal of signal, they
produced a systematic remnant. In essence, the act of removing the quadrupole
created the multipoles and the associated systematic anisotropy. Once the
quadrupole was removed, the multipoles appeared as extremely consistent
variations on the maps. As previously mentioned, these findings have no
relevance to cosmology and are purely an artifact of signal processing.”
And this (Robitaille
2007b):
“Apparent anisotropy
must not be generated by processing”.
Recall that these
supposed anisotropies are in micro-K and the foreground from the galaxy is in
mK and the dipole signal is also inmK. So the alleged anisotropies are ~1000
times weaker than the noise that contaminates the images. Now it is well known
to imaging scientists and scientists working in radiometry laboratories that it
is impossible to extract such a weak signal from such a high level of noise
unless the experimenter has either (1) a priori knowledge of the nature of the
signal source, or (2) the ability to physically manipulate the signal source.
Neither of these options was available to COBE. It is also well known to those
scientists that data-processing for such weak signals in such a contaminated
environment (the galactic signal) produces ghost signals. Data-processing is
what produced Smoot’s anisotropies, not the Universe. Smoot and his colleagues
could not tell the difference between data and data-processing induced spots
before their eyes. CBE-DMR could not even zero the galactic foreground and the
all-sky anisotropy map published by Smoot et al contained the foreground
contamination, which appeared as ragged red band across the centre of their
map.
(9) So COBE-FIRAS did
not detect a CMB and COBE-DMR did not detect anisotropies in the alleged CMB.
COBE-FIRAS detected microwave signals from Earth. COBE-FIRAS did not obtain a
null at 2.725 K and it did not obtain a null at 2.759 K either. It obtained no
null. The COBE-FIRAS team could not obtain a null anywhere, because FIRAS was
so defective. They never got a null between sky and calibrator. They
manufactured a “near null” at 2.759 K by doctoring their interferograms. The
blackbody curve at 2.725 K was also manufactured in order to corroborate their
false “near null” for their alleged CMB. They omitted all data < 2cm^(-1),
and shifted the vertical axis of their graph a whole division to the left in an
attempt to disguise this fact. In their earlier reports the FIRAS team reported
data < 2cm^(-1) but later reports dropped this data, without any explanation
whatsoever. As I previously remarked, it is the lower frequencies which
diffracted most over the FIRAS shield. The FIRAS team merely threw out all data
< 2cm^(-1). The FIRAS team reported that they got higher than expected
intensities at the lower frequencies and lower than expected intensities at the
higher frequencies; which is precisely what must happen with diffraction over
the shield. Since they could not actually get a null they blamed instrument
errors and so bundled them all into their ‘calibration file’, and they
arbitrarily applied a 4% reflectance, and they tried to calibrate in flight by
using the Moon, amongst many other useless band aids.
(10) What about the
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)? Recall that WMAP was a
differential instrument and so it was completely blind to the alleged CMB
isotropic monopole signal. WMAP was located at L2, about 1.5 million km from
Earth, positioned so that Earth was always between it and the Sun. Since it was
a differential instrument WMAP did not detect a CMB temperature at 2.725 K. It
was incapable of such a measurement. It was designed only to detect
anisotropies, and hence its name. However, just like COBE-DMR it had to extract
a supposed signal that is ~1000 times weaker than the galactic foreground. It
therefore suffered from the very same incapability of the COBE-DMR. None of the
WMAP images are unique. WMAP can’t reproduce images from its own datasets. WMAP
anisotropy maps are composites of images at 5 different frequencies. These 5
images were combined by arbitrarily assigning positive or negative coefficients
to each frequency, to produce a final image. This method was called Internal
Linear Combination (ILC). The only restriction to these coefficients was that
they sum to 1. The purpose of these shenanigans was solely to try to zero the
galactic foreground (remember that the galactic foreground is anisotropic noise
that must be data-processed out). The WMAP team arbitrarily weighted a
particular frequency band (the V-band). Why? - Because other bands were so
fogged by noise that they were quite useless (e.g. the K-band). Not only that,
no ILC could zero the foreground, so the WMAP team arbitrarily divided up each
image into 12 sub-images, 11 of which were in the galactic foreground. They
then proceed to ‘clean’ these composites by arbitrarily applying different
integrated linear coefficients to each sectional image, and even varied these
coefficients by as much as 100% in adjacent sectional images. None of this
comes anywhere near to minimal standards in image processing. The WMAP team
made up their own rules for image processing, violating all accepted standards
in imaging science. One can vary these integrated linear coefficients at will
to produce completely different images. Consequently there is no WMAP
anisotropy image that is unique. Tegmark and his colleagues ‘cleaned’ WMAP raw
images by a different method to ILC’s. Their anisotropy map is very different
to the WMAP anisotropy map. Not only that, Tegmark et al crucially relied upon
the alleged cosmic blackbody curve at 2.725 K produced by COBE-FIRAS. The
anisotropy map from Tegmark et al is no better than the WMAP anisotropy map.
They contain no valid data. All such maps are meaningless.
(11) What about the
European Space Agency (ESA) Planck satellite? It was located at L2. Its LFI was
capable of operating in both absolute and differential modes. It carried on
board two 4K blackbody reference loads by which its Low Frequency Instrument
(LFI) could in fact make an absolute mode measurement. The Planck team has
reported an anisotropy map using both its High Frequency Instrument (HFI) and
the LFI. They allege it is in close correlation with WMAP’s anisotropy map.
However, the Planck anisotropy map is on a different scale to the WMAP
anisotropy map, and so they are not in fact in close correlation. They are very
different maps! Also, since WMAP anisotropy maps are not unique and hence
meaningless, Planck’s anisotropy map is an alleged match with demonstrable
nonsense. How did the Planck team manage such a feat? It stinks! Moreover, the
Planck team never reported detection of a monopole signal at L2. That’s because
there is no monopole signal at L2. And that’s because the signal detected by
COBE-FIRAS is from Earth.
(12) Penzias and
Wilson detected a 3K signal from the ground with a primitive horn that was
swamped by microwaves from the atmosphere. Their detection was not cosmic.
There has been no detection of a CMB.
Unless the proponents
of the alleged CMB produce a monopole signal at L2 the case is closed. They
have not done so, and they never will. So the case is closed. There is no CMB
afterglow of some big bang expanding universe.
(13) There have been
recent developments on the alleged CMB alignment of the dipole signal and
multipoles of the alleged CMB. It is claimed that there is an alignment of the
dipole and multipoles that makes the Earth very special so that it is not only
at the centre of the solar system but also at the centre of the Universe. Thus,
it is claimed that not only is the solar system geocentric, but so is the
Universe. Max Tegmark, along with other various proponents of black holes and
big bangs and CMB big bang afterglow, appear in a cinema film called The
Principle, supposed to be released sometime in 2014. This film promotes now the
geocentric universe on the alleged alignment of the dipole signal, and the
multipoles of the so-called CMB. Here is the trailer for the film:
http://www.theprinciplemovie.com/
So the alleged CMB is
now touted as proof of Earth at the centre of the Universe.
REFERENCES
Fixsen D.J. and
Mather J.C. The spectral results of the farinfrared absolute spectrophotometer
instrument on COBE. Astrophys. J., 2002, v. 581, 817–822.
Mather J.C., Cheng
E.S., et al., A preliminary measurement of the cosmic microwave background
spectrum by the cosmic background explorer (COBE) satellite, Astrophys. J.,
1990, v.354, L37-L40.
Max Tegmark, Angélica
de Oliveira-Costa1 & Andrew J. S. Hamilton, A high resolution foreground
cleaned CMB map from WMAP, Phys. Rev. D., 2003.
Robitaille P.-M. On
the Earth Microwave Background: Absorption and Scattering by the Atmosphere,
Prog. In Phys., 2007, v. 3, 3-4.
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-10-01.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
WMAP: A Radiological Analysis, Prog. In Phys., 2007b, v. 1, 3–18.
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2007/PP-08-01.PDF
Robitaille P.-M. The
Earth microwave background (EMB), atmospheric
scattering and the
generation of isotropy. Prog. In Phys., 2008, v. 2, 164–165.
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2008/PP-13-24.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
Water, Hydrogen Bonding, and the Microwave Background’, Progress in Physics,
Vol.2, April, 2009, Prog. In Phys., (Letters to the Editor), v. 2, L5-L8.
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-17-L2.PDF
Robitaille P.-M.
COBE: A Radiological Analysis, Prog. In Phys., 2009a, v. 4, 17–42.
http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2009/PP-19-03.PDF
Smoot G. and Davidson
K. Wrinkles in time: witness to the birth of the Universe, Harper Perennial, New
York , N.Y.
<>
